2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Evaluation of Neglect Assessment Reveals Motor-Exploratory Predictor of Functional Disability in Acute-Stage Spatial Neglect

Abstract: Objective Spatial neglect is a failure or slowness to respond, orient, or initiate action towards contra-lesional stimuli, associated with functional disability that impedes stroke recovery. Early identification of specific neglect deficits may identify patients likely to experience chronic disability. However, psychometric evaluation of assessments has focused on subacute/chronic populations. We addressed this gap by assessing two neglect measures – the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) and the Catherine Berg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(51 reference statements)
2
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the CBS may be more sensitive to detect neglect (and neglect improvement), especially body-based, motor-exploratory or functional deficits, as compared to paper-and-pencil tests. 24,36 Consistent with this argument, the quadratic component on assessment session approached significance for the BIT, but not CBS. This pattern suggests those with Aiming deficits were still improving on the CBS, but that participants’ improvement on the BIT was plateauing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It is possible that the CBS may be more sensitive to detect neglect (and neglect improvement), especially body-based, motor-exploratory or functional deficits, as compared to paper-and-pencil tests. 24,36 Consistent with this argument, the quadratic component on assessment session approached significance for the BIT, but not CBS. This pattern suggests those with Aiming deficits were still improving on the CBS, but that participants’ improvement on the BIT was plateauing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Participants in this dataset had unilateral right hemisphere brain damage, with no history of dementia, uncontrolled glaucoma, or previous head trauma with loss of consciousness (data on subsets of the patients with contralesional neglect in this dataset have previously been published; Chen et al, 2012; Goedert et al, 2012, 2013). All 132 patients were evaluated with the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE; Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975), Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT; Wilson, Cockburn & Halligan, 1987), Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS; Azouvi, Olivier, Montety, Samuel, Louis-Dreyfus & Tesio, 2003) and Barthel Index (Mahoney & Barthel, 1965).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tal resultado pode ter ocorrido em função da presença de heminegligência visual em 20% dos adultos com LHD. A heminegligência visual é uma falha ou lentidão em responder, orientar ou iniciar ações para estímulos contralaterais à lesão cerebral (Goedert et al, 2012), ocorrendo com maior frequência em pacientes com LHD , principalmente quando o lobo parietal é atingido (Molenberghs & Sale, 2011), podendo afetar o processo de leitura e de escrita.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified