1993
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4534(93)90488-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity effect theories for metallic multilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] For the first solution, the fitted parameters are close to what one knows from the measurements. However, the dimensional crossover, typical for S/N multilayers, appeared to lie at a much higher temperature than the measured one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] For the first solution, the fitted parameters are close to what one knows from the measurements. However, the dimensional crossover, typical for S/N multilayers, appeared to lie at a much higher temperature than the measured one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This can be understood globally in terms of superconducting bulk properties. For a bulk superconductor the only eigenvalue that contributes in the determinant (6) is the ground state eigenvalue, which is proportional to the diffusion constant and the magnetic field, and inversely proportional to the magnetic flux quantum φ 0 = hc 2e [1,17,20],…”
Section: The Influence Of the Parameters On The Proximity Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They restricted their calculations to a particular class of systems, in which the component layers have the same T c , but different diffusion constants. To such systems, it was shown [2] that the Werthamer theory applies exactly. Similar results were obtained by Takanaka [8], but he initially started from the Takahashi-Tachiki theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Really, in irregular metal oxide samples used in works, 17,18 the ratio c Ќ / Ќ ϳ1 and DB Ϸc Ќ ( DB is the electron de Broglie wave length͒. This means that the quasiclassical solution [24][25][26][27][28] itself could be dubious for the last mentioned case, while the problem should be handled self-consistently, for the details of the electron spectrum dependent on the ⌬(x) shape. A different approach was implemented in works 11,29 to calculate the electron spectrum of a multilayered metal oxide within the tunneling Hamiltonian formalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%