2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4843-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal Tibia Reconstruction After Bone Tumor Resection: Are Survivorship and Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement and Osteoarticular Allograft Similar?

Abstract: Level III, therapeutic study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether it is preferable to perform reconstruction of large segmental bone defects after tumor resections including joints with allografts or with massive endoprostheses is still unsolved. All-over results are comparable, however there are differences with regard to causes of failure [3] Proximal tibia reconstruction after bone tumor resection with osteoarticular allografts yielded similar failures compared to endoprosthetic replacement, favouring allograft reconstructions in younger patients to achieve better extensor mechanism function [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whether it is preferable to perform reconstruction of large segmental bone defects after tumor resections including joints with allografts or with massive endoprostheses is still unsolved. All-over results are comparable, however there are differences with regard to causes of failure [3] Proximal tibia reconstruction after bone tumor resection with osteoarticular allografts yielded similar failures compared to endoprosthetic replacement, favouring allograft reconstructions in younger patients to achieve better extensor mechanism function [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Toy et al [2] and Verbeek et al [3] addressed problems encountered in femoral osteoarticular allografts and complications in revision to total hip replacement (THA) or total knee replacement (TKA); 61% of THA/TKA respectively in retained allografts had complications, mostly structural failures (periprosthetic fractures/allograft fractures [3]). A study comparing outcome of proximal tibia reconstructions with either osteoarticular allografts or endoprosthetic replacement showed separate advantages, however not significantly different overall failure rates (at 10 years 44% for endoprostheses and 32% for allografts [4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this issue of CORR 1 , we are proud to publish the award winner for the best paper from Latin America in 2016, a large and comprehensive comparison of endoprosthetic reconstruction and osteoarticular allograft after tumor resections of the proximal tibia [1]. With patients from two major tumor centers in Argentina and nearly 400 patients, I expect this paper by Albergo and colleagues to be as definitive a look at this topic as we are likely to see.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Survival depends greatly on the type and stage of cancer, but with a combination of local and systemic treatment, cure rates range from 85% among patients with stage I disease to 10% to 20% for patients with stage IV disease. 2 However, the cure has a cost: the same life-saving surgery, radiation, and anthracycline chemotherapy used to treat cancer often comes with the loss of fertility, early and late cardiotoxicity, and orthopedic problems. These outcomes include loss of spermatogenesis and premature ovarian failure; acute cardiomyopathy during chemotherapy and late cardiomyopathy in subsequent decades; infections and complications of limb-salvage surgery; and death.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%