2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal humeral fractures in younger patients: fixation techniques and arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude the use of a dedicated fracture-specific humeral stem during shoulder arthroplasty for fracture improves functional parameters, improves radiographic bone healing, and appears to standardize the management of these patients. The data reported here parallel the historical reports of Dr. Neer and other recent peer-reviewed publications demonstrating similar tuberosity bone healing and restoration of active overhead elevation [4,6,7,18]. …”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conclude the use of a dedicated fracture-specific humeral stem during shoulder arthroplasty for fracture improves functional parameters, improves radiographic bone healing, and appears to standardize the management of these patients. The data reported here parallel the historical reports of Dr. Neer and other recent peer-reviewed publications demonstrating similar tuberosity bone healing and restoration of active overhead elevation [4,6,7,18]. …”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similarly, Sperling et al [18] have also found improved tuberosity healing (75%) and subsequent improved functional parameters with the use of a dedicated fracture stem. These results have been echoed by Boileau et al [4], with tuberosity healing exceeding 80% using a fracture-specific humeral stem. It has been demonstrated, with proximal humeral fractures, bone healing alone may not completely correlate with return of rotator cuff function [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…21 However, reduction loss did not occur more frequently with the deltopectoral approach (11 of 147, 7.5%) than with the minimally invasive approach (6 of 105, 5.7%) in this study. Despite the many favorable clinical outcomes, the minimally invasive approach was not superior and should not be exaggerated in the terms of reduction loss.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Displaced fractures which can represent an indication for surgical treatment are between 13 and 16 % of all cases [5]. For these fractures, it is difficult to define a universally accepted treatment, even because retrospective studies and meta-analyses have not yet clarified whether one protocol of treatment is superior to others [6][7][8][9][10]. Specific indications such as conservative treatment and prosthesis implant are strictly related to clinical and radiographic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%