Proximal forearm nerve branching patterns: an anatomical study and its clinical significance

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to add to the understanding of nerve branching patterns in the proximal forearm and consider optimal nerve transfer options to address the various injuries that affect the function of the upper extremity. METHODS Eleven upper-extremity cadaveric specimens were dissected to expose the radial, median, and ulnar nerves in the proximal forearm. The site of origin of nerve branches from the major nerves was assessed, with measurements made in reference to the lateral epicondyle for the radial nerve branches and the medial epicondyle for the median and ulnar nerve branches. The distances to where these branches entered their respective muscles (muscle entry point) were assessed using the same landmarks. To plan a transfer, the length of the nerve branches was then calculated as the difference from the apparent origin from the main nerve trunk to the location where the nerve entered the muscle. Importantly, the nerve branch origin was established as the location of obvious separation from the main nerve trunk without additional fascicular dissection from the major nerve trunk. The number of branches was determined, and the diameter for each branch was measured using a Vernier caliper. RESULTS The radial nerve branch to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) muscle had an average length of 50.7 mm and average diameter of 1.6 mm. The mean medial and lateral lengths of the radial branches to the supinator muscle were found to be 22.2 mm (diameter 1.4 mm) and 15.3 mm (diameter 1.3 mm), respectively. The anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) branch of the median nerve was found 67.8 mm distal to the medial epicondyle with a diameter of 2.3 mm. The flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscle innervation from the ulnar nerve was provided by 3 or 4 branches in most specimens. The second and third of these branches were the longest, with means of 30.5 mm (diameter 1.4 mm) and 30.7 mm (diameter 1.3 mm), respectively. CONCLUSIONS While there is variability of the nerve branching pattern in the proximal forearm between specimens, the authors provide evidence of commonalities (branching patterns and distances) that can facilitate planning for upper-extremity nerve reconstructions. Importantly, all measurements are provided with reference to easily identified bony landmarks and to their muscle entry points to aid operative decision-making. These data complement the growing practice of nerve transfers in the upper extremity for a variety of pathologies.