2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2778(11)80003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal Femoral Geometry in Indians and its Clinical Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
26
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
10
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…given by Moore et al [11]. The studies of Ali L et al [12], Ravichandran D [13] [15]which has presented the mean value of 136.6 0 of right and 136 0 of left respectively. Another study reported the values lower than our study as the angle of 122.5 to the right and 125.6 to the left femur [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…given by Moore et al [11]. The studies of Ali L et al [12], Ravichandran D [13] [15]which has presented the mean value of 136.6 0 of right and 136 0 of left respectively. Another study reported the values lower than our study as the angle of 122.5 to the right and 125.6 to the left femur [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proximal femoral parameters are very important structural and functional specialization for mans erect posture 5 There are regional differences in the stature of human beings so prosthesis should be designed according to specific population 4 . It is vital to match the dimensions of the implant closely with those of the femur, as some of the complications resulting from mismatch could be aseptic loosening, improper load distribution and discomfort 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the geometrical measurement of proximal end of femur was the main target 6 . The neck shaft angle (NSA) was measured by Goniometer (Fig 2) for which the axis of the neck was determined by a line dividing the anterior surface of the neck into two equal halves and the axis of the shaft was determined by the line dividing the anterior surface of the shaft in two equal halves 5 . Femoral head diameter (FHD) was measured by vernier calliper (Fig 2), and it was taken as mean of vertical diameter (distance between two extreme points along craniocaudal plane) and transverse diameter (distance between two extreme points along transverse plane).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations