2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2831-7_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic Identification of Saliva Proteins as Noninvasive Diagnostic Biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent studies that compared the concentration of proteins in saliva and plasma have observed that same components are found in similar concentration in both fluids ( 33 ). Thus, nowadays, saliva is becoming an acceptable diagnostic bio-specimen, mainly due to the advancements in protein analytical techniques ( 34 ). Saliva collection does not require specially trained personnel for sampling procedure, it is easy, non-invasive and more practical ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, recent studies that compared the concentration of proteins in saliva and plasma have observed that same components are found in similar concentration in both fluids ( 33 ). Thus, nowadays, saliva is becoming an acceptable diagnostic bio-specimen, mainly due to the advancements in protein analytical techniques ( 34 ). Saliva collection does not require specially trained personnel for sampling procedure, it is easy, non-invasive and more practical ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, the most used diagnostic fluids in laboratory setting were blood and urine (32). However, recent studies that compared the concentration of proteins in saliva and plasma have observed that same components are found in similar concentration in both fluids (33). Thus, nowadays, saliva is becoming an acceptable diagnostic bio-specimen, mainly due to the advancements in protein analytical techniques (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, for the optimum pre-clinical testing of new therapies, the clinical evaluation of diverse patient cohorts during the various phases of clinal studies/trials, and long-term therapeutic monitoring, robust and specific biomarkers for the routine screening of the status of dystrophic patients are required [ 144 , 264 , 265 , 410 , 411 ]. Ideal protein biomarkers would be measurable in a non-invasive, or at least minimally invasive, way and be suitable for repeated sampling procedures [ 325 , 345 , 410 , 411 , 412 ].…”
Section: The Pathoproteomic Profiling Of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of the serum carbonic anhydrase isoform CA3 alone versus the ratio of serum myoglobin to CA3 can be used to determine the loss of integrity of dystrophic skeletal muscles versus dystrophin-deficient heart muscle [ 423 ]. An interesting new source of non-invasive biomarkers is represented by the saliva proteome [ 412 ], whose analysis showed elevated levels of the kallikrein isoform Klk1 in the mdx-4cv model of DMD [ 344 , 433 ]. How future multi-omics research initiatives can build on these proteomic findings and establish a more comprehensive pathophysiological picture of dystrophinopathy is briefly outlined in the below section.…”
Section: The Pathoproteomic Profiling Of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Matrisomal proteins: perlecan, biglycan, decorin, alpha-dystroglycan, fibronectin, laminin, mimecan, nidogen, periostin, prolargin, matrix metalloproteinases and a large number of collagen isoforms; In the context of biomarker research, the systematic cataloguing of the skeletal muscle secretome has established that many muscle proteins can be detected in suitable biofluids such as serum/plasma, urine or saliva for diagnostic purposes [324]. Muscle proteins that are associated with the intracellular fractions of myofibers can passively leak or be actively released into the systemic circulation due to strenuous exercise or traumatic muscle damage and then detected in biofluids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%