2014
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2,070
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,459 publications
(2,073 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2,070
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the provision of the mzqViewer should help both bioinformaticians and lab‐based scientists to visualise and understand their data. Lastly, the two tools used in combination should help groups to prepare quantitative data in PSI standard format (mzQuantML or mzTab) for submission to PRIDE/ProteomeXchange 29 in support of published studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, the provision of the mzqViewer should help both bioinformaticians and lab‐based scientists to visualise and understand their data. Lastly, the two tools used in combination should help groups to prepare quantitative data in PSI standard format (mzQuantML or mzTab) for submission to PRIDE/ProteomeXchange 29 in support of published studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mzTab exporter embeds the jmzTab API 24, writing valid files that for example could be submitted to the ProteomeXchange public repository 29 or loaded into a spreadsheet or statistical software easily. To support end user visualisation of results and downstream analysis, we have also written exporters to a simple Comma Separated Values (CSV) file format (not‐standardised), equivalent version in XLS (Excel format) and HTML for viewing mzQuantML formatted results in web‐pages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, post‐translationally modified pMHC (e.g., phosphorylations,30 symmetric vs asymmetric demethylation,31 O‐GlcNAc vs O‐GalNAc32) may be directly identified by enabling variable modifications in the database searches. Therefore, all raw and processed data should be submitted to a public proteomic or immunopeptidomic repository (e.g., the resources included in the ProteomeXchange Consortium [http://www.proteomexchange.org/], such as PRIDE, MassIVE, jPOST, and iProX repositories,33 or the recently created SysteMHC Atlas immunopeptidomic data repository [https://systemhcatlas.org/]34) to enable better collaborations among researchers and data reuse by third parties, to advance the field more efficiently. As discussed above, immunopeptidomics experiments are carried out by applying different methods, using a variety of instrument types, and employing different computational analysis tools.…”
Section: Informatics and Pmhc Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is encouraged that data is submitted to one public repository, following the requirements established by the ProteomeXchange Consortium 33. Data submissions must then include at least: the metadata information described in Section 2.1.1, raw data (MS data coming from the mass spectrometer), and processed results, including the output of the analysis (ideally in an open standard format if possible, e.g., mzIdentML, mzTab).…”
Section: Informatics and Pmhc Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This goal was obtained with the establishment of the ProteomeXchange consortium 28, which connects some of the most used proteomics databases (at present PRIDE, MassIVE, PASSEL, and PeptideAtlas) with a single submission system and the use of unique identifiers that can be tracked across these databases and over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%