1995
DOI: 10.1016/0034-5288(95)90023-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection of cattle from bovine tuberculosis by vaccination with BCG by the respiratory or subcutaneous route, but not by vaccination with killed Mycobacterium vaccae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
97
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In adoptive transfer experiments, however, Orme and Collins (25) demonstrated that aerogenic immunization with BCG offered no protective advantage over s.c. immunization in mice. This finding has also been supported in other animal models of mycobacterial infections, such as possums (1) and cattle (6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In adoptive transfer experiments, however, Orme and Collins (25) demonstrated that aerogenic immunization with BCG offered no protective advantage over s.c. immunization in mice. This finding has also been supported in other animal models of mycobacterial infections, such as possums (1) and cattle (6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Currently, promising vaccines against bovine TB are based on heterologous prime-boost combinations that include the live attenuated M. bovis vaccine strain bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) as one of their components (8). However, as for humans, the vaccination of cattle with BCG compromises the specificity of the tuberculin skin test since PPD contains crossreactive antigens shared by both pathogenic and vaccine strains (4,5,26). Therefore, the development of diagnostic tests for differentiating vaccinated from infected animals (DIVA) is an essential prerequisite to allow the inclusion of BCG-based vaccination as part of bovine TB control strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both live and killed vaccines induce similar ex vivo IFN-γ ELISPOT responses, but vaccination with live BCG elicits stronger long-term cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT responses than do killed vaccine preparations. Interestingly, live vaccines are protective while killed formulations fail to provide protection against challenge with virulent tuberculous mycobacteria [31][32]33 . Assessment of Tcm responses is also feasible by sorting these cells from PBMC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT response has been applied to assess memory responses by human, and cattle when evaluating tuberculosis vaccine responses [14][15][16][31][32]33 . Tcm responses are also assumed to play significant roles in host responses to several other infectious agents of cattle, such as: Mycoplasma mycoides subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%