2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles against radiation-induced acute lung injuries in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are consistent with the authors’ earlier data on the antioxidant properties of CeO 2 nanoparticles, which showed that, at the concentration of 10 −5 M, they were able to effectively reduce the generation of radiation-induced hydrogen peroxide [ 30 ]. The redox properties of nanoceria enables it to work as a scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals, preventing the development of radiation-induced damage to cells, organs, and whole organisms [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. It has previously been shown that nanoceria is capable of inactivating a wide range of radicals and ROSs, including the hydroxyl radical [ 36 ], nitroxyl radical [ 37 ], singlet oxygen [ 38 ], and superoxide anion radical [ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are consistent with the authors’ earlier data on the antioxidant properties of CeO 2 nanoparticles, which showed that, at the concentration of 10 −5 M, they were able to effectively reduce the generation of radiation-induced hydrogen peroxide [ 30 ]. The redox properties of nanoceria enables it to work as a scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals, preventing the development of radiation-induced damage to cells, organs, and whole organisms [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. It has previously been shown that nanoceria is capable of inactivating a wide range of radicals and ROSs, including the hydroxyl radical [ 36 ], nitroxyl radical [ 37 ], singlet oxygen [ 38 ], and superoxide anion radical [ 39 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[93] Moreover, CeO 2 NPs can also enhance the antioxidant capacity of cells by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway to upregulate the production and release of intracellular antioxidant substances. [117] CeO 2 NPs can activate cell proliferation and growth by regulating various signaling pathways, including PI3K/Akt, ERK/MAPK, and Wnt/𝛽-catenin. [142] It has been shown that CeO 2 NPs can also increase the protein content and mechanical strength of the extracellular matrix and improve cell adhesion and survival, thereby promoting cell proliferation and growth.…”
Section: Cerium Oxide Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 93 ] Moreover, CeO 2 NPs can also enhance the antioxidant capacity of cells by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway to upregulate the production and release of intracellular antioxidant substances. [ 117 ]…”
Section: Therapeutic Care Modalities For Prevention and Each Type Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many applications of their radical scavenging properties, one of the most promising is protecting normal tissues during radiation therapy. CONPs have been shown under many conditions to be excellent radioprotectors of several normal tissue types [ 26 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. For example, in similar studies assessing radioprotection of normal cell culture lines, CONPs were able to increase the cell viability of fibroblasts by 20% following 6 MV photon irradiation to 4 Gy and of epithelial cells by 27% following 18 MV photon irradiation to 3 Gy [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CONPs given i.p. to mice before irradiation of the thorax to 18 Gy using 6 MV photons were able to significantly reduce neutrophile aggregation and lung tissue collapse [ 35 ]. A similar study of mice treated with i.p.-injected CONPs prior to 15 Gy thorax irradiation with 320 kV photons showed that CONPs decreased lung structural damage, collagen deposition, inflammation, and vascular damage compared to control mice [ 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%