2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13582-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ProTargetMiner as a proteome signature library of anticancer molecules for functional discovery

Abstract: Deconvolution of targets and action mechanisms of anticancer compounds is fundamental in drug development. Here, we report on ProTargetMiner as a publicly available expandable proteome signature library of anticancer molecules in cancer cell lines. Based on 287 A549 adenocarcinoma proteomes affected by 56 compounds, the main dataset contains 7,328 proteins and 1,307,859 refined protein-drug pairs. These proteomic signatures cluster by compound targets and action mechanisms. The targets and mechanistic proteins… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VIP-values quantify the impact each variable (i.e. protein) has on the OPLS-DA model, with a higher value corresponding to a greater contribution 27 , 30 . Thus the proteins with the highest VIP values are suitable as candidates for validation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VIP-values quantify the impact each variable (i.e. protein) has on the OPLS-DA model, with a higher value corresponding to a greater contribution 27 , 30 . Thus the proteins with the highest VIP values are suitable as candidates for validation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ). The idea of specific response is borrowed from our methods of Functional Identification of Target by Expression Proteomics 26 and ProTargetMiner 27 . Using orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) 28 , we create models where the proteins’ Tm values for the enzyme + cosubstrate treatment are contrasted against those of the other groups: enzyme-treated and cosubstrate-treated lysates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The idea of specific response is borrowed from our methods of Functional Identification of Target by Expression Proteomics (FITExP) 21 and ProTargetMiner 22 . In this approach, using orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) 23 , protein Tm in "enzyme + cosubstrate" treatment can be contrasted with those in "control" (cell lysate incubated with vehicle), "enzyme"-treated lysate, and "cosubstrate"-treated lysate.…”
Section: Huang Et Al Have Recently Developed a Methods Called Hotspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In OPLS-DA, the VIP-values show the impact each x-variable (i.e. protein) have on the model with a higher value corresponding to a greater contribution 22,25 . In Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Siesta Identified and Ranked Multiple Known And Putative Txnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes the sets of fixed and variable modifications recommended by AA_stat in comparison with the modification sets from annotation of the respective studies. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Comparing the annotated and AA_stat-retrieved modifications, both expected and unexpected modifications can be mentioned. For example, Cys-carbamidomethylation was annotated for all data, however, two subsets with enrichments of phosphorylated peptides (#9, #10 in Figure 2) and one subset with R-methylation enrichment (#12 in AA_stat demonstrates a potential for uncovering rare modifications.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 96%