2021
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography in the Evaluation of Initial Response in Candidates Who Underwent Salvage Radiation Therapy after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emmett et al [20] showed that in 100 patients with either negative PSMA-PET or local recurrent disease on PSMA-PET, approximately 10% of patients experienced biochemical progression of disease at 1 yr after SRT. Besides, Meijer et al [21] and Schmidt-Hegemann et al [22] showed an overall treatment response, defined as a PSA value of 0.1 ng/ml after PSMA-PET/CT-guided SRT, rate of 75-78%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Emmett et al [20] showed that in 100 patients with either negative PSMA-PET or local recurrent disease on PSMA-PET, approximately 10% of patients experienced biochemical progression of disease at 1 yr after SRT. Besides, Meijer et al [21] and Schmidt-Hegemann et al [22] showed an overall treatment response, defined as a PSA value of 0.1 ng/ml after PSMA-PET/CT-guided SRT, rate of 75-78%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in the studies performed by Emmett et al [20] and Schmidt-Hegemann et al [22], patients underwent more extensive SRT to both the prostatic fossa and the pelvis, whereas patients with known (lymph-node) metastases at lymph-node dissection were not excluded. Besides, Meijer et al [21] performed their analyses on patients who underwent SRT at a median PSA value of 0.4 ng/ml, compared with 0.7 ng/ml in the study performed by Stephenson et al [19]. Furthermore, the use of ADT was no reason for exclusion in most of these studies, making biochemical endpoints difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not single out ADT as a factor to help predict PSMA positivity. The data in the literature are conflicting and confounding factors such as ADT administration in the higher‐risk cohort and ADT flair effect reduce the reliability of this marker [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation cohort consisted of 157 men with rising PSA after RP from the Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands who underwent 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT without concurrent ADT. The imaging procedure was as previously described [8] . We evaluated the performance of the two nomograms in terms of their discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides preventing misdirected SRT by detecting metastatic PCa recurrences, PSMA PET/CT can detect local recurrence. Detection of a local recurrence is a positive predictor for SRT efficacy [8] . Up to now, PSMA PET/CT has mainly been used to exclude metastatic disease because of radioactivity considerations for the bladder, whereas local recurrences often remain undetected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%