2016
DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate brachytherapy: Why do we ignore the evidence?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is requirement in US Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Radiation Oncology Program that trainees should perform no fewer than five interstitial and 15 intra‐cavitary BT implants during their training, there is no stipulation on the minimum number of brachytherapy cases that have to be performed by trainees in the Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology training programme. Hence, there is reason to be concern that the continue decline in use of HDR‐BT may result in Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees having a lack of exposure and training opportunity on HDR‐BT, which in the longer terms may translate into a shortfall of radiation oncologists proficient in HDR‐BT, and further under‐utilisation of HDR‐BT in the future …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is requirement in US Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Radiation Oncology Program that trainees should perform no fewer than five interstitial and 15 intra‐cavitary BT implants during their training, there is no stipulation on the minimum number of brachytherapy cases that have to be performed by trainees in the Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology training programme. Hence, there is reason to be concern that the continue decline in use of HDR‐BT may result in Australian and New Zealand radiation oncology trainees having a lack of exposure and training opportunity on HDR‐BT, which in the longer terms may translate into a shortfall of radiation oncologists proficient in HDR‐BT, and further under‐utilisation of HDR‐BT in the future …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%