2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02214-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostanoid receptor genes confer poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma via epigenetic inactivation

Abstract: Background: Chronic inflammation is a risk factor for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and other diseases. Prostanoid receptors are clearly involved in the development of many types of cancer. However, their role is not simple and is poorly understood in HNSCC. Methods: Methylation profiles of prostanoid receptor family genes were generated for tumour samples obtained from 274 patients with HNSCC, including 69 hypopharynx, 51 larynx, 79 oral cavity, and 75 oropharynx tumour samples, by quantitativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ndings align with established knowledge concerning the role of promoter hypermethylation in gene silencing, which signi cantly contributes to the initiation of tumorigenesis. Our results further support the idea that hypermethylation of genes encoding prostaglandin receptors, exempli ed by PTGFR, seen in colorectal and ovarian cancers, could potentially redirect transcriptional disruption toward the activation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) function while blocking other biologically active prostaglandins 21,22 . This underscores the pivotal role of DNA methylation as a mechanism deeply involved in deregulating this pathway.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These ndings align with established knowledge concerning the role of promoter hypermethylation in gene silencing, which signi cantly contributes to the initiation of tumorigenesis. Our results further support the idea that hypermethylation of genes encoding prostaglandin receptors, exempli ed by PTGFR, seen in colorectal and ovarian cancers, could potentially redirect transcriptional disruption toward the activation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) function while blocking other biologically active prostaglandins 21,22 . This underscores the pivotal role of DNA methylation as a mechanism deeply involved in deregulating this pathway.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As candidate genes for the detection of hypopharyngeal cancer, we selected genes that were previously reported by comprehensive analyses [ 23 , 24 ] and systematic reviews [ 25 , 26 ] as being hypermethylated in tissue or saliva samples in advanced HNSCC cases. Four genes, Deleted in Colorectal Cancer ( DCC ) [ 21 , 27 ], Prostaglandin D2 Receptor 1 ( PTGDR1 ) [ 28 , 29 ], Endothelin Receptor β ( EDNRB ) [ 21 , 30 ], and E Cadherin ( ECAD ) [ 31 , 32 ], were selected for this study. Primers were designed to specifically amplify the bisulfite-converted DNA of each gene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forward and reverse sequences of each primer and β-actin ( ACTB ), as an internal reference gene, are listed in Supplementary Table S1 . These primers were previously determined to detect the methylation status of target gene promoters [ 21 , 28 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard curve for quantitative real-time methylation and unmethylation PCR (Q-MSP and Q-UMSP) was constructed by plotting five serially diluted standard solutions of EpiScope Methylated HCT116 gDNA (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) and EpiScope® Unmethylated HCT116 DKO gDNA (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan). The normalized methylation value (NMV) was defined as follows: NMV = (TSGs-S/TSGs-FM)/(ACTB-S/ACTB-FM), where TSGs-S and TSGs-FM represent TSGs methylation level in sample and universally methylated DNA, respectively, and ACTB-S and ACTB-FM correspond to β-actin levels in samples and universally methylated DNA, respectively [ 15 ]. Known amounts of LINE-1 methylated and unmethylated DNA molecules were used to generate absolute standard curves (y = − 6.125 * log(x) + 26.54 and y = − 2.765 * log(x) + 21.19, respectively).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%