Prospects of Public Participation in the Planning and Management of Urban Green Spaces in Lahore: A Discourse Analysis

Abstract

Green spaces in cities are under pressure from increasing population, urbanization, and development, making governance of these common pool resources a complex and multi-dimensional process. Governance of urban green spaces can be improved by participatory approaches. However, many developing countries do not have the institutional structures and policies that promote the participation of a range of non-state actors, and green spaces are often removed from public access by regulatory slippage or elite capture for parks and gardens. This paper uses discourse analysis to explore the perspectives of the key stakeholders for public participation in the planning and management of green spaces in Lahore. The study employs Q-methodology to reveal four discourses: ‘Efficient Management’, ‘Anti/Pro-Administrative’, ‘Leadership and Capacity building’, and ‘Decentralization or Elite capture’. The most significant and dominant discourse of ‘Efficient Management’ shows stakeholders’ preferences towards developing new institutional arrangements at the local level through engaging citizens. The two discourses ‘Leadership and Capacity building’ and ‘decentralization or elite capture’ are also in favor of changing the power dynamics in the system at certain levels by using different strategies. However, the status quo-oriented administrative discourse serves as a barrier, resisting change at any level. The results of this study suggest a need for policy reforms to develop a conducive environment in which all the stakeholders can be engaged through different collaborative and co-management schemes, in order to achieve economically efficient, ecologically sustainable and socially equitable, urban green spaces in Lahore.

How Can We Mitigate Power Imbalances in Collaborative Environmental Governance? Examining the Role of the Village Facilitation Team Approach Observed in West Kalimantan, Indonesia

“…Powerful actors, such as governments, often continue to control collaborative processes [22], resulting in benefits for dominant groups [23,24], which may hinder social capital development in powerless communities [25]. Elites, including government officers, tend to prevent transferring authority to local communities, which lowers the latter's empowerment [26,27]. One of the major challenges in CG is the government's unwillingness to share control over decision making [28].…”

How Urban Forest Managers Evaluate Management and Governance Challenges in Their Decision-Making

“…While some Q-method studies use a larger number of statements (between 25 and 50 statements; see [45,49]), they often combine these larger numbers with a smaller number of participants (~20). While studies using a smaller set of statements are not uncommon (e.g., [69]), these smaller sets can be combined with a large selection of participants to yield reliable results [62,70,71].…”

Climate-water governance: a systematic analysis of the water sector resilience and adaptation to combat climate change in Pakistan

“…Equally, the engagement of stakeholders, mainly water users and managers, generally remained weak in Pakistan. Under the traditional government hierarchy, the status quo-oriented style of water-climate-environment management is most prevalent in Pakistan, in which vital policies and decisions are mostly made without effective consultations with the stakeholders (Mustafa et al, 2017;Alam & Lovett, 2019;Young et al, 2019). For example, most of the community engagement reforms, like the PIDA model (irrigation management transfer to the community), have not yielded the desired results.…”