Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)

Noguera, José; Cuadrado, Angel Paladini; Dolz, Carlos; Olea, José María de Santayana y Gómez de Pardo; Garcı́a, Juan Carlos

doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2359-4

Cited by 62 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The median pain scores were 3.94, 2.52, 0.73, 0.36, and 0.10, respectively. This pain was very well controlled by the standard oral narcotic pain medications [42].…”

Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transvaginal Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: Current Techniques and Advantages

Barajas‐Gamboa

Jacobsen

2013

Curr Surg Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has proven to be a safe and effective procedure, with low rates of complications and mortality since its introduction in the late 1980s. However, surgeons have been working to develop alternatives to this technique to improve clinical outcomes and the level of patient satisfaction. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is one such alternative. NOTES has potential benefits compared to conventional laparoscopic and open surgery, including reduced abdominal wall trauma and trocar site complications, lower infection rates, less postoperative pain, decreased hospital stays, and excellent cosmetic results. Transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy is the most common NOTES procedure performed. The objective of this article is to review this surgical technique and its clinical outcomes based on the current scientific evidence available in the literature.

show abstract

“…The median pain scores were 3.94, 2.52, 0.73, 0.36, and 0.10, respectively. This pain was very well controlled by the standard oral narcotic pain medications [42].…”

Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transvaginal Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: Current Techniques and Advantages

Barajas‐Gamboa

Jacobsen

2013

Curr Surg Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…I have read with interest the comments by Dr. Carlson [1] about our study [2] and I want to thank him for his interest in improving the quality of surgical investigations and Surgical Endoscopy.…”

mentioning

confidence: 94%

Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2958-8: Re: Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)

Noguera

2013

Surg Endosc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, NOTES is associated with a number of potential obstacles, as instruments must be improved in order to obtain safe access to peritoneal cavities, allow adequate exposure, ensure secure closure methods, manage infection control and allow correct orientation (11). The transumbilical approach is favored, as it decreases the disadvantages associated with NOTES; the transumbilical approach, using a flexible endoscope, is a promising, single-incision approach (12).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An innovative procedure of laparoscope combined with endoscopy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor resection and cholecystectomy: A case report and literature review

Yan

Gai

et al. 2016

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The present study reports a novel approach to laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resection and cholecystectomy, and conducts a review of the associated literature. The novel surgical procedure was performed on one patient who was diagnosed with a GIST and cholecystic polypus. The GIST was resected using an insulation-tipped diathermic electrosurgical knife under the guide of an endoscope. Subsequently, a cholecystectomy was performed by inserting two more 5-mm trocars and instruments transumbilically, guided using an endoscope. The tumor and the gallbladder were exteriorized using a peroral approach and the incision lining of the stomach was sutured laparoscopically. The procedure was successfully performed and the patient experienced no discomfort during the 5-year follow-up. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery is feasible and would be an ideal choice for invisible abdominal scar surgery, in particular for multi-visceral resection.

show abstract

Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)

Abstract: NOTES approaches using the flexible endoscope are not inferior in safety or effectiveness to conventional laparoscopy. The transumbilical approach with flexible endoscope is as effective and safe as the transvaginal approach and is a promising, single-incision approach.

Cited by 62 publications

References 24 publications

Transvaginal Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: Current Techniques and Advantages

Transvaginal Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: Current Techniques and Advantages

Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2958-8: Re: Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)

An innovative procedure of laparoscope combined with endoscopy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor resection and cholecystectomy: A case report and literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About