2019
DOI: 10.1177/2325967119875415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective Evaluation of Range of Motion in Acute ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Autograft

Abstract: Background: Optimal timing of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been a topic of controversy. Reconstruction has historically been delayed for at least 3 weeks, given previous studies reporting a high risk of postoperative arthrofibrosis and suboptimal clinical results. Purpose: To prospectively evaluate postoperative range of motion following acutely reconstructed ACLs with patellar tendon autograft. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients (age >18 years) who had… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is concern that early ACL reconstruction may be associated with higher rates of arthrofibrosis and other complications, but the evidence with regard to this is highly conflicting. 6,26,37,39,43,50,51,54 Although our data showed an increased risk of chondral damage as time elapsed from injury to ACL reconstruction, this meta-analysis considered only those patients who ultimately underwent ACL reconstruction, and we can make no inferences about the rates of chondral damage in patients who were treated without ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the clinical conundrum and challenge remain the identification of which patients will require ACL reconstruction at an early stage in their treatment pathway, as our findings suggest that for these patients, early reconstruction may protect articular cartilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, there is concern that early ACL reconstruction may be associated with higher rates of arthrofibrosis and other complications, but the evidence with regard to this is highly conflicting. 6,26,37,39,43,50,51,54 Although our data showed an increased risk of chondral damage as time elapsed from injury to ACL reconstruction, this meta-analysis considered only those patients who ultimately underwent ACL reconstruction, and we can make no inferences about the rates of chondral damage in patients who were treated without ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the clinical conundrum and challenge remain the identification of which patients will require ACL reconstruction at an early stage in their treatment pathway, as our findings suggest that for these patients, early reconstruction may protect articular cartilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Harris reported in his study that there was no loss of extension >3 degrees as compared with the contralateral knee in any patient. There was no loss of flexion >5 degrees as compared with the contralateral knee in any ACL reconstruction patient who completed objective follow-up ( 31 ). The mean active flexion range of motion in this study improved from 117.4 degrees preoperatively to 137.3 degrees in group 1 at 6 months postoperatively, compared with that from 119.8 degrees preoperatively to 137.7 degrees in group 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent evidence supports that patients achieve comparable range of motion without an increased risk of arthrofibrosis, as well as good clinical outcomes, after an acute ACL reconstruction versus a delayed surgery. 13,14 A study directly comparing this one-stage technique versus staged operations is needed to further characterize postoperative clinical and functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%