Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life and Nutrition Before and After Treatment for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Abstract

Objective: To prospectively assess quality of life in patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is standard for advanced nasopharyngeal cancer; however, the toxic effects of this treatment are substantial. Design: Prospective evaluation of quality of life and nutritional status before and after treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Patients and Intervention: A cohort of 14 patients, treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for 7 weeks, completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and Head and Neck Module before and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Changes in score were analyzed and correlated with the toxic effect grade. Results: Quality of life issues during the 24 months of follow-up included poorer global health (P = .01), fatigue (P=.01), appetite loss (PϽ.001), swallowing difficulties (P=.002), sense problems (P=.03), difficulty with social eating (P =.005), dental problems (P=.045), trismus (P = .001), xerostomia (PϽ.001), sticky saliva (P =.001), cough (P =.02), and feeling ill (P =.03). Pain (P =.004) and emotional functioning (PϽ.001) significantly improved from the pretreatment rating. The median weight loss was 7 kg, with most weight loss occurring during treatment, despite nutritional support with gastrostomy feeding tubes. One patient still required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding at 2 years after treatment. Physician-scored toxic effects correlated poorly with quality-of-life scores. Conclusions: Quality of life and functional assessment should be important end points in the follow-up of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer who receive chemoradiotherapy. This study supports the need for ongoing support and rehabilitation in a multidisciplinary setting.

Quality of Life and Radiotherapy Complications of Chinese Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients at Different 3DCRT Stages

“…The results were similar to previously published research (Huang et al, 2000;Pow EH et al, 2003;Palazzi et al, 2004;Pow EH et al, 2006;Oates et al, 2007). NPC patients with longer survival time reported lower scores of xerostomia, caries, hearing loss, snuffles than those under 3DCRT.…”

A Randomized Preventive Rehabilitation Trial in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Chemoradiotherapy: Feasibility, Compliance, and Short-term Effects

“…Also, mean weight loss was somewhat less in our study (6.1 kg, 7.8%), than in the studies of Newman et al [42] (10%) and Oates et al [43] (mean = 8.2 kg; 13%).…”

“…Analyzing the oral intake (less than 50% by mouth) and tube dependency, patients in the study by Lazarus et al [37] showed the best scores (18 vs. 18%). In the present study, scores of 35 vs. 37% were found, with a wide range of 23–79% and 26–93% in other studies [7, 32, 38, 39, 42–44]. …”

Psychological distress and coping in nasopharyngeal cancer: an explorative study in Western Europe

“…In the late toxicity evaluation, our sample reported slight-to-moderate impairment of the mucous membrane and salivary gland function. These data were observed in previous studies on patients treated for head and neck cancer (Oates et al, 2007;Cooper et al, 1995).…”