Prospective evaluation of clinical and ultrasonic feto-maternal parameters as predictors of caesarean delivery after induction of labour

Gowda, Deepika N; Kumar, Amit; Sood, Rajeev; Sood, Anupa

doi:10.7439/ijbr.v5i4.576

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nowadays, inducing labor (IOL) is a routine treatment in obstetric practice. For different maternal and fetal reasons, IOL is currently performed for 20 percent of pregnancies (1) , and approximately 20 percent of labor inductions result in caesarean delivery (2) . The cervix's favorability, which is often determined by the physical inspection and Bishop Score, is the primary determinant of IOL success (3) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of Different Scoring Systems for Predicting Successful Induction of Labor: A Cross-Sectional Study

2023

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Nowadays, inducing of labor (IOL) is a routine treatment in obstetric practice. For different maternal and fetal reasons, IOL is currently performed for 20 percent of pregnancies. Limited to non-pregnant women, prediction score methods for IOL success have indicated that a good preoperative cervical exam is the most important factor. AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of Different Scoring Systems for Predicting Successful Induction of Labor. Patients and methods: the study was conducted on department obstructs and gynecology faculty of medicine Assiut University on 410 patients and they divided into CS (n= 104) and Vaginal delivery (n= 306) . Results: there was a statistical significant difference between groups regarding Kaplan Meier analysis of time to delivery based Bishop score and Manipal U/S scoring system, Protocol of induction and Pregestational DM. There was no statistical significant difference between groups regarding to Accuracy of different scoring system in prediction of successful induction. Conclusion: Predicting whether or not a woman will have a successful vaginal birth following induction of labor is becoming increasingly important as a result of the possible impact on healthcare spending, as evidenced by the rapid increase in the development of prediction models. But because most published models lack external validation and there are limitations in scope, methodology, and/or measurement of effectiveness in clinical settings, it is difficult to endorse any one model for widespread clinical usage.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of Different Scoring Systems for Predicting Successful Induction of Labor: A Cross-Sectional Study

2023

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

"Comparison of sonographic score and Bishop score in the prediction of successful labor induction in term patients: A prospective observational study".

preethi R,

Tripathy

2024

Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prospective evaluation of clinical and ultrasonic feto-maternal parameters as predictors of caesarean delivery after induction of labour

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

Accuracy of Different Scoring Systems for Predicting Successful Induction of Labor: A Cross-Sectional Study

Accuracy of Different Scoring Systems for Predicting Successful Induction of Labor: A Cross-Sectional Study

"Comparison of sonographic score and Bishop score in the prediction of successful labor induction in term patients: A prospective observational study".

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About