Prospective Evaluation of a New Classification System for the Management of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures

Bhagol, Amrish; Singh, Virendra; Kumar, Ish; Verma, Ajay Kumar

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.050

Cited by 29 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although many studies have searched for the best and most suitable treatment, the issue remains controversial (Palmieri et al, 1999;Park et al, 2010;Sharif et al, 2010). In both types of treatment complications occur, such as deviation of the chin and/or facial asymmetry (Park et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2002;Bormann et al, 2009); reduced mandibular motility (Palmieri et al, 1999;Niezen et al, 2010); dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint (Silvennoinen et al, 1998;Gupta et al, 2012); ankylosis (Gupta et al, 2012); chronic pain (Chen et al, 2011); and malocclusion (Marker et al, 2000;Bhagol et al, 2011;Silvennoinen et al, 1998;Zachariades et al, 2006;Forouzanfar et al, 2013). When conservative treatment of a condylar fracture is preferred over ORIF, many modalities for obtaining IMF can be considered (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conservative treatment of a mandibular condyle fracture: Comparing intermaxillary fixation with screws or arch bar. A randomised clinical trial

Bergh

Blankestijn

Ploeg

et al. 2015

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conservative treatment of a mandibular condyle fracture: Comparing intermaxillary fixation with screws or arch bar. A randomised clinical trial

Bergh

Blankestijn

Ploeg

et al. 2015

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The cause of the difference in the results of this study is probably caused by a total of 101 samples from 206 samples of this study having no description of the location of the fracture in the mandible so that the results obtained for the grouping of the anatomical location of the occurrence of the mandibular fracture become limited. (Bhagol A, 2013). In this study based on the incidence of postoperative malocclusion, showed that 79% of patients did not experience malocclusion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Relation between the Location of the Mandibular Fracture and the Incidence of Post ORIF Malocclusion in H. Adam Malik Central General Hospital Medan, Indonesia

Manalu

Buchari

Tarigan

2018

ijmsci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…of all mandibular fractures 5 , being considered one of the most controversial fractures concerning to diagnosis and treatment 6 .…”

Section: Mandibular Condyle Fractures Represent 25-35%mentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomechanical analysis of titanium plate systems in mandibular condyle fractures: a systematized literature review

Costa¹,

Bezerra²,

Ribeiro³

et al. 2012

Acta Cir. Bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE:To conduct a systematized review of the literature about the main methodologies used to evaluate the biomechanical fixation systems with titanium plates in fractures of the mandibular condyle. METHODS: A systematized review of literature was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS and MEDLINE without restriction of the publication date. The eligibility criteria were laboratory studies involving mandibular condyle fractures, studies using titanium plates, biomechanical studies, in vitro and computational studies involving the finite element method (FEM). RESULTS: Eleven articles that met the eligibility criteria were selected, including seven articles involving in vitro studies and four studies with biomechanical analysis by using FEM. CONCLUSION: Although few articles have used the finite element method, the results of in vitro studies were similar to those found in computational studies, regarding to the stable use of two titanium miniplates. Key words: Mandibular Condyle. Fracture Fixation. Titanium. Biomechanics. Review. RESUMO OBJETIVO:Realizar uma revisão sistematizada da literatura sobre as principais metodologias empregadas na avaliação biomecânica de sistemas de fixação com placas de titânio em fraturas de côndilo mandibular. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma revisão sistematizada da literatura nas bases de dados eletrônicas PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS e MEDLINE sem restrição quanto à data de publicação. Os critérios de elegibilidade foram estudos laboratoriais envolvendo fraturas de côndilo mandibular, estudos utilizando placas de titânio, estudos biomecânicos, estudos in vitro e estudos computacionais envolvendo o método de elementos finitos (MEF). RESULTADOS: Foram selecionados 11 artigos que se enquadraram nos critérios de elegibilidade, incluindo sete artigos envolvendo estudos in vitro e quatro utilizando análise biomecânica através do MEF. CONCLUSÃO: Embora poucos artigos tenham utilizado o método de elementos finitos, os resultados das pesquisas in vitro assemelhamse aos encontrados nos estudos computacionais, com relação ao uso estável de duas miniplacas de titânio. Descritores: Côndilo Mandibular. Fixação de Fratura. Titânio. Biomecânica. Revisão. Biomechanical analysis of titanium plate systems in mandibular condyle fractures. A systematized literature review

show abstract

Prospective Evaluation of a New Classification System for the Management of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures

Cited by 29 publications

References 10 publications

Conservative treatment of a mandibular condyle fracture: Comparing intermaxillary fixation with screws or arch bar. A randomised clinical trial

Conservative treatment of a mandibular condyle fracture: Comparing intermaxillary fixation with screws or arch bar. A randomised clinical trial

Relation between the Location of the Mandibular Fracture and the Incidence of Post ORIF Malocclusion in H. Adam Malik Central General Hospital Medan, Indonesia

Biomechanical analysis of titanium plate systems in mandibular condyle fractures: a systematized literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About