2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective comparison of the value of CARG, G8, and VES-13 toxicity tools in predicting chemotherapy-related toxicity in older Turkish patients with cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This rate was 40% in the TH3RESA study, 25.7% in the KATHERINA study, and 37.5% in the KAMILIA study [7,29,30]. These differences in the incidence of adverse events between studies may be related to many factors, such as the median age of the patients included, performance status, treatment lines, and sites of metastasis [10,31]. The most common serious adverse events were fatigue, nausea, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, consistent with previous studies [10,32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This rate was 40% in the TH3RESA study, 25.7% in the KATHERINA study, and 37.5% in the KAMILIA study [7,29,30]. These differences in the incidence of adverse events between studies may be related to many factors, such as the median age of the patients included, performance status, treatment lines, and sites of metastasis [10,31]. The most common serious adverse events were fatigue, nausea, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, consistent with previous studies [10,32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The presently available literature about VES-13 in the majority refers to neoplastic diseases. According to some researchers, VES-13 is a feasible tool for predicting survival and qualifying for oncological treatment [10,64,65,68,69]. In our results, neoplastic diseases did not impact on VES-13 in multivariate design.…”
Section: Other Chronic Conditionssupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Previous studies have also developed predictive models for chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer that incorporate geriatric assessment variables. For example, the Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients (CRASH) and the Cancer Aging Research Group (CARG) toxicity score have both been shown to represent reliable predictors of chemotherapy toxicity and overall survival in older cancer patients [ 8 , 12 , 26 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GA-guided treatment plans have been shown to improve overall survival (OS), quality of life, physical function, and decrease the risk of hospitalization [ 6 , 7 ]. The available data also support the value of GA as an effective tool to predict the patient’s tolerance of cytotoxic interventions [ 8 ]. Most previous studies focused on the prediction of chemotherapy toxicity and showed that the factors most consistently associated with toxicity were functional status and comorbidity [ 9 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%