Propiedades Psicométricas del Inventario Psicológico de Ejecución Deportiva (IPED) en deportistas peruanos de Alto Rendimiento

Abstract

To measure athlete’s success and his sports performance, it is required to quantify the maximum performance developed during seasons of trainings and championships; using a valid, reliable and adapted to peruvian context instrument. However, caution is urged when considering there is no psychometric evidence to support the use of any scale related to peruvian high performance athletes sample. The current study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Sports Performance Psychological Inventory (IPED) in the mentioned sample. Method: Participated 255 peruvian athletes with ages between 14 and 38 years (N:23; SD: 4.29); who actively represents the country and in sports modalities affiliated with the Peruvian Sports Institute (IPD). For the collection of information, a sociodemographic record, Sports Performance Psychological Inventory (IPED) and the Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ) were used. Results: IPED model demonstrated, that the seven-dimensional model had an acceptable fit (SBχ2 = 2243.096 / df = 798; CFA= .955; SRMR= .095; RMSEA= .084 [IC90%: .080 - .069] and reliability analyses revealed high internal consistency (ω = .841 > ω = .754). In addition, scores correlated positively between IPP and MTQ dimensions (AC= .678; CAN= .557; CAT= .457 ; CVI= .328; NM= .425; CAP= .641; CAC= .662 ) and Control (AC= .558; CAN= .733; CAT= .682 ; CVI= .171; NM= .272; CAP= .432; CAC= .563) Conclusion: The IPED provides adequate evidence of validity and reliability to measure and establish a profile of strengths and weaknesses in high performance athletes from all of its dimensions in the peruvian context. Resumo: Para medir o sucesso de um atleta e seu desempenho esportivo é necessário quantificar o desempenho máximo que ele realiza durante os treinos e campeonatos a partir de um instrumento válido e confiável adaptado ao contexto peruano. No entanto, até o momento não há evidências psicométricas para apoiar o uso de qualquer instrumento por atletas qualificados. Nesse sentido, o objetivo principal deste estudo é avaliar as propriedades psicométricas do Inventário de Performance Psicológica para o Esporte (IPED) na referida população. Método: participaram 255 atletas que representam ativamente o país nas modalidades esportivas filiadas ao Instituto Peruano de Esportes (IPD). As idades variaram de 14 a 38 anos (N: 23; DT: 4,29). Para a coleta das informações foi utilizado um inventário sociodemográfico, o Sports Performance Inventory e o Mental Strength Questionnaire. Resultados: O modelo sete-dimensional IPED apresentou um bom ajuste dos dados (SBχ2 = 2243,096 / df= 798; CFI= ,955; SRMR= ,095; RMSEA= ,084 [IC90%: 0,080-0,069] e consistência interna adequada para as dimensões que variam entre ω = 0,841 e o menor valor ω = 0,754. Da mesma forma, foram observadas correlações positivas e estatisticamente significativas entre as 7 dimensões do IPED com as dimensões de confiança (AC = 0,678; CAN = .557; CAT = .457; CVI = .328; NM = .425; CAP = .641; CAC = .662) e Controle (AC = .558; CAN = .733; CAT = .682; CVI = .171; NM = .272; CAP = .432; CAC = .563) do Questionário FM. Conclusão: Conclui-se que o IPED apresenta evidências de confiabilidade e validade adequadas para medir o desempenho esportivo e que, portanto, é um instrumento capaz de avaliar o desempenho psicológico no esporte em atletas de diferentes modalidades esportivas.

Young athletes’ psychological skills for performance: The role of perceived coaches’ interpersonal styles

“…En esta línea, diversos trabajos han analizado y comparado las habilidades psicológicas para el rendimiento utilizando en lugar de la edad o los años de práctica, variables que caracterizan el nivel competitivo de los deportistas, tales como: expertos y no expertos (Álvarez et al, 2014), elite o amateur (Berengüí et al, 2012;López-Gullón & Torres-Bonete, 2012) o participación en Selección Nacional (Raimundi et al, 2016), obteniendo así comparaciones entre grupos definidos por razones vinculadas al desarrollo deportivo. Sin embargo, en la mayoría de los estudios, se ha encontrado que el género sí tiene un efecto significativo en las habilidades psicológicas percibidas de los deportistas (Gómez-López et al, 2013;Hernández-Mendo et al, 2014;Raimundi et al, 2016). Ahora bien, en aquellos estudios en donde los participantes son deportistas de nivel élite o alto rendimiento, las diferencias en función del género no se encuentran (Martínez-Moreno, 2017).…”

Contributions of one hypothetical model of predictive relationships between psychological skills and emotional intelligence in university student-athletes: A cross-sectional study

“…Sport psychology contributions attempt to investigate the psychological and behavioral factors of sport development and improvement [ 1 ] from a holistic approach centered on the improvement of physical, technical, and tactical components [ [2] , [3] ], [ [2] , [3] ]. It should be clarified that this discipline focuses on different types of athletes: both amateur athletes (those who dedicate their free or leisure time to the practice of a sport), as well as professional athletes (who exercise their profession in sport), or high-performance athletes (who compete in a particular discipline at an international level) [ 4 ].…”

“…And, subsequently, the motivational level relates to the importance and reasons why the athlete does sport. Such motives can be internal or external [ 1 ].…”

Relationship between resilience, optimism, and burnout in Pan-American athletes

“…Recent studies significantly associate optimism and resilience (Yu and Zhang, 2007;Parkes and Mallet, 2011;Souri and Hasanirad, 2011;Freche, 2013;Tutte and Reche, 2016;Cortez-Saldarriga et al, 2022;Lacárcel et al, 2022). In addition, it seems that the most optimistic athletes (who tend to be also the most resilient) present less anxiety and greater selfconfidence, in addition to better performance (Martin-Krumm et al, 2003).…”