1988
DOI: 10.2307/2046816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Property C � � and Function Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are generalizations of and actually imply the classical properties C and Hurewicz respectively; further, it is proved in [8] that a space X has property C (ω) if and only if each finite power X n has property C . Note that the γ F property defined above is clearly equivalent to the γ F property together with the Hurewicz(ω) property.…”
Section: Definition 33mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These are generalizations of and actually imply the classical properties C and Hurewicz respectively; further, it is proved in [8] that a space X has property C (ω) if and only if each finite power X n has property C . Note that the γ F property defined above is clearly equivalent to the γ F property together with the Hurewicz(ω) property.…”
Section: Definition 33mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this proof we need to refer the reader to some facts from the literature -in particular [7], [13], [17], [18], [19] and [20]. The following theorems summarize some of the results we use.…”
Section: Proposition 19 Every Hfd Satisfies S 1 (D D)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since C p (X) is homogeneous, countable strong fan tightness of C p (X) is equivalent to countable strong fan tightness at some f ∈ C p (X). In [18] Sakai proved for T 3 1 2 -spaces X that C p (X) has countable strong fan tightness if, and only if, X has property S 1 (Ω, Ω); in [20] I gave more characterizations for this, among others each of H 1 (Ω, Ω) for X and H 1 (Ω f , Ω f ) for C p (X) at some f is equivalent to the countable strong fan tightness of C p (X). Thus, we find from the results here that for X separable and metrizable, the countable strong fan tightness of C p (X) is equivalent to TWO not having a winning strategy in G D ω (C p (X)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A space X is said to have countable fan tightness [ 1 ] if for each x £ X and each countable system {An : n £ N} of subsets of X such that x £ f\ A" there exist finite sets B" of A" such that x £ (J Bn . If each B" is replaced with a singleton subset in the above definition, then X is said to have countable strong fan tightness [14].…”
Section: Fan Tightness Of K-metrizable Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stratifiable K-metrizable space does not always have countable strong fan tightness. Since CP(C, {0, 1}) does not have countable strong fan tightness [14], there exists a sequence {An : n £ N} of subsets in CP(C, {0, 1}) such that fo £ f)A~n ; but for any h" £ A" f0 £ CP(C, {0, 1}) -{h" : « € N} . This implies that L in Example 2.2 does not have countable strong fan tightness.…”
Section: Fan Tightness Of K-metrizable Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%