2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting regional sustainability by eco-province construction in China: A critical assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Social economic development (especially urbanization), driven by population increase and technological progress, have incurred a variety of profound environmental impacts in the world Wang et al, 2015;Tao et al, 2016), including resource depletion, ecological degradation, environmental pollution, and biodiversity losses, etc. For example, Chinese environmental degradation cost due to environmental pollution lost in 2004, 2005, and 2006 was …”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social economic development (especially urbanization), driven by population increase and technological progress, have incurred a variety of profound environmental impacts in the world Wang et al, 2015;Tao et al, 2016), including resource depletion, ecological degradation, environmental pollution, and biodiversity losses, etc. For example, Chinese environmental degradation cost due to environmental pollution lost in 2004, 2005, and 2006 was …”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [61] conducted case study analysis to evaluate the progress of ecological construction in the Shandong province in China by means of a pre-set of qualitative and quantitative indicators. Sustainability and ecological efficiency indicators have often been developed as ratios, such as water consumption to inhabitants, and amount of CO 2 produced per year.…”
Section: The Academy-oriented Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study did not cover the qualitative aspects of sustainability such as social and cultural indicators while particular focus was given on quantitative ones which have been broadly classified into natural resource consumption indicators (e.g., fossil fuels), pressure indicators (e.g., CO2 emissions), category indicators (e.g., acidification), and total environmental impact indicators. Based on considerations of measurability, data availability and quality, and policy interests, we selected two types of eco-efficiency indicators for our study: efficiency of the resource (RE) and efficiency of the environment (EE) [2,27]. RE includes energy consumption (EC) and water resource consumption (WC).…”
Section: Eco-efficiency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%