2023
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2022.3221778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive Feature Transmission for Split Classification at the Wireless Edge

Abstract: We consider the scenario of inference at the wireless edge, in which devices are connected to an edge server and ask the server to carry out remote classification, that is, classify data samples available at edge devices. This requires the edge devices to upload high-dimensional features of samples over resource-constrained wireless channels, which creates a communication bottleneck. The conventional feature pruning solution would require the device to have access to the inference model, which is not available… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The split inference is an advanced edge AI architecture designed to optimize energy consumption in edge devices [5], [18]- [20]. Specifically, the overall model is partitioned into two components, with one part being processed by the edge device and the other by the server.…”
Section: A Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The split inference is an advanced edge AI architecture designed to optimize energy consumption in edge devices [5], [18]- [20]. Specifically, the overall model is partitioned into two components, with one part being processed by the edge device and the other by the server.…”
Section: A Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the classification model should be divided into two parts to implement split inference, i.e., device sub-model and server sub-model. Following the widely used designs [5], [18], the splitting point is set after the CONV layers, where the output of the last CONV layer is a feature map with height L h and width L w . Each element in the feature map is quantized with a sufficiently high resolution of Q bits such that quantization errors are negligible.…”
Section: B Transmission Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Discrimination Gain: The sensing accuracy is largely determined by the discernibility between a pair of classes that can be measured by discrimination gains computed as their symmetric Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence [38]. Considering sensor k, the local discrimination gain between classes ℓ and ℓ ′ , denoted as G k (ℓ, ℓ ′ ), can be computed as…”
Section: E2e Performance Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rayleigh fading, representing spatial diversity from rich scattering and spatially separated sensors. Last, the E2E sensing accuracy is measured by the popular metric of sensing uncertainty that is computed as the entropy of posteriors of object classes conditioned on observations [38], [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation