Programming dynamic reconfigurable systems

Ballouli, Rim El; Bensalem, Saddek; Bozga, Marius; Sifakis, Joseph

doi:10.1007/s10009-020-00596-7

Cited by 13 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A combination of UML components and BIP is proposed in [10], and it focuses on the description and verification of component behavior and inter-component communication. An extension of BIP is DR-BIP [14] that adds support for dynamic reconfigurations.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ensemble-Based Modeling Abstractions for Modern Self-optimizing Systems

Töpfer¹,

Abdullah²,

Bureš³

et al. 2022

Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Adaptation and Learning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we extend our ensemble-based component model DEECo with the capability to use machine-learning and optimization heuristics in establishing and reconfiguration of autonomic component ensembles. We show how to capture these concepts on the model level and give an example of how such a model can be beneficially used for modeling access-control related problem in the Industry 4.0 settings. We argue that incorporating machine-learning and optimization heuristics is a key feature for modern smart systems which are to learn over the time and optimize their behavior at runtime to deal with uncertainty in their environment.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ensemble-Based Modeling Abstractions for Modern Self-optimizing Systems

Töpfer¹,

Abdullah²,

Bureš³

et al. 2022

Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Adaptation and Learning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This issue comprises 7 papers addressing the key elements outlined above. Papers [3,18] contribute to the design of correct-by construction high-level models by defining a highlevel modelling formalism [18] and by providing an approach for debugging CPS models [3]. Papers [9,14,22,24,28] contribute to the design and proof of domain-specific abstractions.…”

Section: This Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

“…By doing so the authors also introduce their own policy model called UseCON. -The paper "Programming dynamic reconfigurable systems" by El Ballouli, Bensalem, Bozga, and Sifakis [18] is an extension of the ISoLA 2018 and FACS 2018 papers [16,17] by the same authors. The paper focuses on programming dynamic reconfigurable systems.…”

Section: This Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

On methods and tools for rigorous system design

Bliudze

Katsaros

Bensalem

et al. 2021

Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Full a posteriori verification of the correctness of modern software systems is practically infeasible due to the sheer complexity resulting from their intrinsic concurrent nature. An alternative approach consists of ensuring correctness by construction. We discuss the Rigorous System Design (RSD) approach, which relies on a sequence of semantics-preserving transformations to obtain an implementation of the system from a high-level model while preserving all the properties established along the way. In particular, we highlight some of the key requirements for the feasibility of such an approach, namely availability of (1) methods and tools for the design of correct-by-construction high-level models and (2) definition and proof of the validity of suitable domain-specific abstractions. We summarise the results of the extended versions of seven papers selected among those presented at the $$1\mathrm {st}$$ 1 st and the $$2\mathrm {nd}$$ 2 nd International Workshops on Methods and Tools for Rigorous System Design (MeTRiD 2018–2019), indicating how they contribute to the advancement of the RSD approach.

show abstract

“…In recent years, dynamic-structure systems such as cloud computing [1,2], smart grids [3], Industry 4.0 [4,5], and the Internet of things [6] have gained much attention. The design of these highly complex systems is a hot topic, yet it remains a challenging issue that requires suitable and rigorous frameworks [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Let A = V l , S, s 0 , Σ, C, E, I . Consider Steps ( 6) and (7). In fact, the former represents an edge e of D by an edge e in A, where the condition "le&&g v " enables e only if (i) the current configuration of A is one of the configurations in which e appears, and (ii) g v , the enabling condition of e, is true.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic Timed Automata for Reconfigurable System Modeling and Verification

Tigane

Guerrouf

Hamani

et al. 2023

Axioms

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern discrete-event systems (DESs) are often characterized by their dynamic structures enabling highly flexible behaviors that can respond in real time to volatile environments. On the other hand, timed automata (TA) are powerful tools used to design various DESs. However, they lack the ability to naturally describe dynamic-structure reconfigurable systems. Indeed, TA are characterized by their rigid structures, which cannot handle the complexity of dynamic structures. To overcome this limitation, we propose an extension to TA, called dynamic timed automata (DTA), enabling the modeling and verification of reconfigurable systems. Additionally, we present a new algorithm that transforms DTA into semantic-equivalent TA while preserving their behavior. We demonstrate the usefulness and applicability of this new modeling and verification technique using an illustrative example.

show abstract

Programming dynamic reconfigurable systems

Cited by 13 publications

References 33 publications

Ensemble-Based Modeling Abstractions for Modern Self-optimizing Systems

Ensemble-Based Modeling Abstractions for Modern Self-optimizing Systems

On methods and tools for rigorous system design

Dynamic Timed Automata for Reconfigurable System Modeling and Verification

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About