2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-016-5229-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein expression in the survival of patients with gastric caner

Abstract: The aim of this study was to detect mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) expression in gastric cancer (GC) and to analyze its association with the prognosis of GC patients. Immunohistochemical staining, Western blotting, and quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction were performed to detect MLKL tissue expression in 117 GC patients. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival data were retrospectively analyzed to discover the clinical importance of MLKL expression. The chi-sq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this point, we propose that patients who have a relatively low level of MLKL in tumor tissues are more likely to respond to TRAIL receptor agonists due to the perturbation in endosomal trafficking of the TRAIL receptor agonist. Abnormal expression of MLKL has been detected in many kinds of tumors, such as colon cancer, ovarian cancer, and gastric cancer [34][35][36] and recent studies also have revealed that MLKL could serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with cancer [37][38][39] . In these studies, the authors revealed that decreased expression of MLKL was significantly associated with poor overall survival in cancer patients suggesting a prognostic and clinicopathological significance of expression level of MLKL in cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this point, we propose that patients who have a relatively low level of MLKL in tumor tissues are more likely to respond to TRAIL receptor agonists due to the perturbation in endosomal trafficking of the TRAIL receptor agonist. Abnormal expression of MLKL has been detected in many kinds of tumors, such as colon cancer, ovarian cancer, and gastric cancer [34][35][36] and recent studies also have revealed that MLKL could serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with cancer [37][38][39] . In these studies, the authors revealed that decreased expression of MLKL was significantly associated with poor overall survival in cancer patients suggesting a prognostic and clinicopathological significance of expression level of MLKL in cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduced expression of key molecules in the necroptotic pathway has been observed in different cancer cell lines, suggesting that these cells may evade necroptosis to survive [6]. As a consequence, a lower expression of necroptosis regulators seems to correlate with a worse prognosis in several types of carcinomas (i.e., breast, colorectal, gastric, and ovarian cancer, and head and neck and cervical squamous cell carcinoma), in acute myeloid leukemia, and in melanoma [30,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. However, the expression of RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL has been found to be upregulated in some cancers (i.e., glioblastoma, pancreatic, lung, and esophageal cancer), in which a high activation of the necroptotic cascade seems to be correlated with a poorer prognosis in different studies [6,36,41,[49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Pro-tumoral Effects Anti-tumoral Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is phosphorylated by RIPK3 to form an oligomeric structure that translocates to the plasma membrane to disrupt membrane integrity and this can be used as a biochemical signature for necroptosis [19]. Studies have demonstrated that low MLKL expression indicated poor prognosis in colon cancer [20], ovarian cancer [21], and gastric cancer [22], indicating that MLKL might serve as a candidate tumor suppressor and a potential prognostic biomarker for various types of cancers. However, the majority of their experimental results were obtained from the tissue samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%