1997
Prognostic Value of Histologic Findings in Neck Dissections for Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
52
17
6
1
Citation Types
5
25
2
2
Year Published
1998
2024
Publication Types
Select...
66
9
Relationship
0
75
Authors
Journals
Cited by 75 publications
(34 citation statements)
References 17 publications
5
25
2
2
“…This is also supported by our results. Pinsolle et al reported a strong relationship between clinical N classification and ECS, and ECS was present in 35% of clinical N1 patients, 55% of clinical N2 patients and 74% of clinical N3 patients, respectively 26. However, the association between clinical N classification and ECS is not confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…This is also supported by our results. Pinsolle et al reported a strong relationship between clinical N classification and ECS, and ECS was present in 35% of clinical N1 patients, 55% of clinical N2 patients and 74% of clinical N3 patients, respectively 26. However, the association between clinical N classification and ECS is not confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…reported increased rates of ECS in nodes greater than 3 cm in diameter (39% vs. 69%). Other investigators have also identified a strong association between ECS and clinical N classification . Although, higher rates of ECS were also observed for nodes > 30 mm in our study (39.5% vs. 60.4%) the relationship between pathological node size and ECS did not reach significance ( P = 0.07).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…This article gives the first report at our institution of patterns of spread in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and compares these patterns within subgroups of patients based on the extent of neck disease at the time of primary surgical resection. For comparison, our overall rates of local-regional (18.8%) as well as distant (17.2%) recurrences are similar to other reports in the literature for local-regional (20% to 27%) 3,10,11 and distant (11.4% to 14.8%) 3,8,10 sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
