2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both static and dynamic CTP has also been reported to have incremental predictive value over clinical risk factors and CTA in assessment for future major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [94,95]. Dynamic CTP was shown to have higher prognostic value for MACE than CTA and CT-FFR, independent of clinical risk factors [96].…”
Section: Current Evidence Of Ctpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both static and dynamic CTP has also been reported to have incremental predictive value over clinical risk factors and CTA in assessment for future major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [94,95]. Dynamic CTP was shown to have higher prognostic value for MACE than CTA and CT-FFR, independent of clinical risk factors [96].…”
Section: Current Evidence Of Ctpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with CT-FFR, CTP has some advantages such as its accessibility, real-time stress myocardial perfusion imaging, instant analysis, and integrating assessment with coronary CTA. Moreover, CTP has a potential to have higher prognostic value for major adverse cardiac events [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using dynamic CTP, a summed stress score based on MBF values proved to be prognostically relevant after adjusted for obstructive CAD on CTA with hazard ratio (HR) of 5.7 (CI: 1.9-16.9, P 5 0.002) [52]. Also, myocardial perfusion defect defined by low index-MBF (<0.88) calculated as a ratio between each segment and global MBF values was associated with MACE after adjusting for coronary CTA, CT-FFR findings, age, sex, and risk factors (HR: 10.1, CI: 2.1-48.8, P 5 0.004) [53]. Notably, dynamic CTP derived perfusion parameters had additive prognostic value beyond clinical risk factors and stenosis severity assessed by coronary CTA [54].…”
Section: Stable Anginamentioning
confidence: 91%