“…In three studies [15][16][17], only visual analysis of PET was used to detect RT and SUVmax was not applied. In the other 6 studies [18][19][20]22,24,25], an SUVmax of 5 was used to detect RT with an average overall sensitivity of 87% (range 71-96%), an average overall specificity of 49% (range 4-80%), an average overall PPV of 41% (range 16-53%) and an average overall NPV of 84% (range 33-97%). Albano et al [26] and Michallet et al [21] proposed a different SUVmax threshold as the best predictor for RT: an SUVmax of 9 and of 10, respectively, with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 67%, 90%, 67% and 90%, respectively, in the first case [26], and 91%, 95%, 29% and 99%, respectively, in the second one [21].…”