2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Significance of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level in Pleural Lavage Fluid for Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these publications, one was excluded because it did not allow the calculation of HR [26], four were excluded because no survival data in negative PLC group were available [6,[27][28][29], three were excluded because the same authors published several reports on the same patients, and only the best-quality study was considered [30][31][32], three were excluded because they did not provide sufficient data to perform a quantitative aggregation [5,33,34]. Subsequently, 15 articles [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were available for analysis of the PLC prognostic significance; the clinical characteristics of these studies, along with ELCWP scores, are outlined in Table 1, and the ELCWP scores in detail are shown in Appendix Table 1 (provided in supplemental material on the Web). Ten studies assessed patients from Japan, four from Europe, and one from the USA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of these publications, one was excluded because it did not allow the calculation of HR [26], four were excluded because no survival data in negative PLC group were available [6,[27][28][29], three were excluded because the same authors published several reports on the same patients, and only the best-quality study was considered [30][31][32], three were excluded because they did not provide sufficient data to perform a quantitative aggregation [5,33,34]. Subsequently, 15 articles [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were available for analysis of the PLC prognostic significance; the clinical characteristics of these studies, along with ELCWP scores, are outlined in Table 1, and the ELCWP scores in detail are shown in Appendix Table 1 (provided in supplemental material on the Web). Ten studies assessed patients from Japan, four from Europe, and one from the USA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies [12,15,18,19] dealt with pleural lavage before lung resection, six studies [17,[20][21][22]24,25] dealt with pleural lavage after lung resection, and five studies [11,13,14,26,23] had PLC data form both before and after lung resection. The outcomes of PLC according to histological type, pathologic stage, status of lymph node metastasis, pleural involvement of the tumor, and postoperative stage are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEA is most often measured in serum, though one study has examined CEA levels in PLF [13] and one study examined the expression in tumor tissue [10], respectively. The use of PLF CEA levels as prognostic markers may be promising, but should be further investigated for the occurrence of false positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomita et al [13] evaluated the use of the level of CEA in PLF as a marker in NSCLC. The cut off value was 5 ng/ml.…”
Section: Nsclc: Cea In Pleural Lavage Fluid (Table 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, several other studies have suggested that PLC findings obtained during surgery are important prognostic indicators (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). However, the contribution of PLC to TNM staging has not yet been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%