2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-018-1274-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic role of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary brain lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to recently published data, it remains controversial whether MTV and TLG can be used as prognosticators . Sharma et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recently published data, it remains controversial whether MTV and TLG can be used as prognosticators . Sharma et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result also showed that, compared with SUVmax, MTV and TLG of the primary tumor can reflect the metabolic burden of tumor lesions more accurately. Previous studies showed that MTV and TLG could represent a combination of tumor volume and metabolism, including both morphological and metabolic features, and may be considered an expression of tumor aggressiveness in addition to tumor size [34]. Thus, 18F-FDG PET/CT, as a very suitable functional imaging method, can represent the tumor burden [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTV and TLG represent a combination of metabolic parameters and morphological findings because they include for definition both radiological and metabolic features can be considered tumor aggressiveness expression. In other malignancies, especially lymphoma, potential prognostic role of metabolic volumes is already demonstrated 34‐37 . The clinical application of MTV and TLG in practice could probably be too early, also due to the lack of a standardized methodology for their measurement; several methods of measurements are suggested in literature with a wide range of cutoff values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are no shared technical references about the measurements of these parameters and specific cutoff defined for GIST. We used an isocontour threshold method based on 41% of the SUVmax as suggested by EANM 26 and already tested in other papers 34‐37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%