2023
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1066748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors of second hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation among hematological malignancy patients relapsed after first hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single center study

Abstract: IntroductionWe aimed to evaluate prognostic factors of a second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT2) among hematological malignancy patients who have relapsed after the first allo-HSCT(allo-HSCT1).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 199 hematological malignancy patients who received allo-HSCT2 as a salvage treatment post allo-HSCT1 relapse between November 2012 and October 2021.ResultsThe median age at allo-HSCT2 was 23 (range: 3-60) years. The median time to relapse after HSCT1 was 9 (range: 1-72)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the high transplant-related mortality rate of secondary transplantation, it still remains the only viable option with 2-year OS up to 43.8% and 5-year OS up to 25%. [28][29][30] According to the previous studies conducted by researchers from Europe and the United States, secondary transplantation with a different donor and/or conditioning intensity from the first HSCT did not bring survival benefit. 30,31 Our findings showed that the secondary transplantation significantly improve the OS in the HLA loss group, but the improvement of OS in the non-HLA loss group was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the high transplant-related mortality rate of secondary transplantation, it still remains the only viable option with 2-year OS up to 43.8% and 5-year OS up to 25%. [28][29][30] According to the previous studies conducted by researchers from Europe and the United States, secondary transplantation with a different donor and/or conditioning intensity from the first HSCT did not bring survival benefit. 30,31 Our findings showed that the secondary transplantation significantly improve the OS in the HLA loss group, but the improvement of OS in the non-HLA loss group was not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite the high transplant‐related mortality rate of secondary transplantation, it still remains the only viable option with 2‐year OS up to 43.8% and 5‐year OS up to 25% 28–30 . According to the previous studies conducted by researchers from Europe and the United States, secondary transplantation with a different donor and/or conditioning intensity from the first HSCT did not bring survival benefit 30,31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term follow-up data from EBMT showed that 120 ALL patients who relapsed after their first transplant received a second transplant with an expected 10-year OS of 5 ± 3%, LFS of 4 ± 2%, RI of 60 ± 5% and NRM of 36 ± 5% ( 27 ). A retrospective analysis of 199 second transplants of hematologic malignancy (48.2% B-ALL) from our center showed that achieving MRD-negative CR, HCT-CI score of 0 before allo-HSCT2, and utilizing a new mismatched haplotype donor were predictive factors of improved OS and LFS compared to patients without these characteristics in second transplant ( 28 ). The 2-year OS was 56.5% for the MRD-negative and 22.2% for the MRD-positive/NR groups, respectively ( 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective analysis of 199 second transplants of hematologic malignancy (48.2% B-ALL) from our center showed that achieving MRD-negative CR, HCT-CI score of 0 before allo-HSCT2, and utilizing a new mismatched haplotype donor were predictive factors of improved OS and LFS compared to patients without these characteristics in second transplant ( 28 ). The 2-year OS was 56.5% for the MRD-negative and 22.2% for the MRD-positive/NR groups, respectively ( 28 ). Consequently, achieving CR or even MRD-negative CR is crucial before undergoing a second transplant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Handgretinger [22] estimates that more than half of all HLA haplotype-mismatched transplants will be performed worldwide following similar protocols. Previous studies at our center demonstrated that conditioning regimens based on GIAC achieved favorable engraftment, OS, and an acceptable morbidity of GVHD among allo-HSCT patients [23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%