2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors for tube feeding dependence after curative (chemo-) radiation in head and neck cancer: A systematic review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
4
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The median neck SMI was 12 (range [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], and 61 patients (48%) became prolonged feeding tube-dependent (see Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The median neck SMI was 12 (range [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], and 61 patients (48%) became prolonged feeding tube-dependent (see Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the extent of tumor and treatment disrupt normal swallowing physiology, and with more extensive tumor and treatment, the risk for developing swallowing problems is increased . Second, poor nutritional status can also contribute to swallowing dysfunction, due to loss of muscle mass and function . As a result of swallowing dysfunction, a substantial proportion (50%‐70%) of patients become feeding tube‐dependent during CRT .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent review states that prophylactic PEG tube placement is a risk factor for PEG tube dependency. 5 This statement is based on a single study 8 where PEG tube dependency was higher in patients with prophylactic placement. The decision on prophylactic placement, however, was based on the clinicians' discretion.…”
Section: Peg-related Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 A systematic review describing the impact of prophylactic PEG use on PEG duration and treatment complications as weight loss described conflicting results in various studies. 5 Most of the studies describing cohorts with prophylactic PEG tubes or comparing prophylactic and reactive PEG tube insertion focus on one of the following outcomes: PEG tube dependency, weight loss and renal failure or quality of life. The present study was performed to investigate the frequency of PEG tube dependency and the complication risk after prophylactic PEG tube placement in patients treated with CRT or radiation with cetuximab for HNC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%