2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.541401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosis Analysis and Validation of m6A Signature and Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Glioma

Abstract: Glioma is one of the most typical intracranial tumors, comprising about 80% of all brain malignancies. Several key molecular signatures have emerged as prognostic biomarkers, which indicate room for improvement in the current approach to glioma classification. In order to construct a more veracious prediction model and identify the potential prognosis-biomarker, we explore the differential expressed m 6 A RNA methylation regulators in 665 gliomas from TCGA-GBM and TCGA-LGG. Consensus clu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 256 publications
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we found strong correlations of CD86 expression with immune infiltration of CD4+ cells, macrophage, neutrophil and dendritic cells. These results were consistent with previous studies (38,42) indicating higher levels of immune cell infiltration may contribute to worse prognosis of LGG. Additionally, CD86 levels demonstrated strong correlations with multiple immune checkpoint molecules, including VSIR, HAVCR2, and PDCD1LG2 (PD-L2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Specifically, we found strong correlations of CD86 expression with immune infiltration of CD4+ cells, macrophage, neutrophil and dendritic cells. These results were consistent with previous studies (38,42) indicating higher levels of immune cell infiltration may contribute to worse prognosis of LGG. Additionally, CD86 levels demonstrated strong correlations with multiple immune checkpoint molecules, including VSIR, HAVCR2, and PDCD1LG2 (PD-L2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although there are several published studies using WGCNA on glioma, most of them has focused on the relationship between module and traits like age, gender, overall survival, IDH mutation, and so on. 21,[29][30][31] In this case, our study paid more attention to identify genes which are clustered with primary and recurrent types of four WHO grade I to IV. Similarly, Mukherjee's work has analyzed relationship between module and WHO grade II to IV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al established prognostic model for glioma, and the AUC values in predicting 1-year survival for glioma were TCGA: 0.623 and CGGA: 0.607; and 3-year survival: TCGA: 0.735 and CGGA: 0.803 [ 27 ]. Lin et al used four genes (TAGLN2, PDPN, TIMP1, EMP3) to build prognostic model for glioma and its AUC values were 0.80 in TCGA cohort and 0.72 in CGGA cohort [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%