2002
DOI: 10.1080/02827580260417224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production Efficiency and Size in Norwegian Sawmilling

Abstract: Production ef ciency in the Norwegian sawmilling sector was investigated by means of data envelopment analysis, using individual mill observations from the period 1974 -91. The resulting ef ciency scores were evaluated with respect to size using censored regression analysis and non-parametric comparison tests. Average ef ciency estimates indicated that the smallest mills (5 5000 m 3 yr ¼ 1 ) were less ef cient than large mills (lumber output \ 25 000 m 3 yr ¼ 1 ). During most of the period studied, average ef … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is still a significant gap in research concerning the interplay between woodworking companies' resources and their strategic choices, as well as in regard to the interaction between the selected strategies and financial performance. In assessing performance, in most cases instead of looking at the financial measures, the focus has been on production efficiency (e.g., Campbell and Jennings 1990, Puttock and Prescott 1992, Baardsen 2000, Nyrud and Bergseng 2002, Nyrud and Baardsen 2003, Salehirad and Sowlati 2005. As important as efficiency is in successful business practices, it does not indicate firm business success, since the capability to create value-added strongly impacts on profits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still a significant gap in research concerning the interplay between woodworking companies' resources and their strategic choices, as well as in regard to the interaction between the selected strategies and financial performance. In assessing performance, in most cases instead of looking at the financial measures, the focus has been on production efficiency (e.g., Campbell and Jennings 1990, Puttock and Prescott 1992, Baardsen 2000, Nyrud and Bergseng 2002, Nyrud and Baardsen 2003, Salehirad and Sowlati 2005. As important as efficiency is in successful business practices, it does not indicate firm business success, since the capability to create value-added strongly impacts on profits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, value added strategies and in general increased market orientation are not the only aspects of profitable strategy development. Being at the forefront in technology development and investing in large-scale operations have also been of importance (Sinclair & Cohen, 1992;Nyrud & Bergseng, 2002;Mårtensson, 2003). Lee et al (1999), especially, emphasise the important relationship between product innovation and process innovation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) the proportion of sawmills operating efficiently in the Canadian province of British Columbia in 2002 was found to be only 7 % (Salehirad and Sowlati 2005). A similar study in Norway determined that around 30 % of sawmills were efficient between 1974 and 1991 (Nyrud and Baardsen 2003). Different operations research tools have been proposed to improve the performance of individual sawmills, mainly falling in one of two categories: (i) tools, mainly simulation models that estimate the amount of lumber products obtained when different cutting patterns are applied to different log classes (Pnevmaticos et al 1974, Occeña andTanchoco 1996), and (ii) tools, mainly mathematical programming models that help selecting the cutting patterns that optimize the process under production and resource constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%