1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0763(199703)4:1<1::aid-arp61>3.3.co;2-x
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Processing Z gradiometer magnetic data using linear transforms and analytical signal

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
11
8
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
18

Relationship

0
18

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 18 publications

(25 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
25
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Then, for further iterations the MSE values increase again which, as noted by Takeda et al . () and Takeda (2009), further reduces the variance of the filtered image and also leads to an increased bias (i.e., the result becomes more blurry). Similarly, increasing h might result in blurred images because of an increased smoothing effect.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe the SKR denoising method following Takeda et al . (). First, we briefly outline the classical kernel regression framework also known from non‐parametric statistics (e.g., Hardle ).…”
Section: Steering Kernel Regression (Skr)
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Then, for further iterations the MSE values increase again which, as noted by Takeda et al . () and Takeda (2009), further reduces the variance of the filtered image and also leads to an increased bias (i.e., the result becomes more blurry). Similarly, increasing h might result in blurred images because of an increased smoothing effect.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We describe the SKR denoising method following Takeda et al . (). First, we briefly outline the classical kernel regression framework also known from non‐parametric statistics (e.g., Hardle ).…”
Section: Steering Kernel Regression (Skr)
mentioning
confidence: 97%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…To facilitate the processing of measured data with neighbourhood vector tools they first have to be converted to polygons from their original raster format. Many methods have been suggested to delineate geophysical anomalies in raster data, most notably based on the calculation of gradients, for example the normalized gradient (Ma and Li, 2012) or the analytical signal (Nabighian, 1972;Tabbagh et al, 1997). Other methods are linked to the specific properties of certain geophysical data, such as Euler deconvolution of magnetometer surveys (Reid et al, 1990) or other complex parameters (Stampolidis and Tsokas, 2012).…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The three-dimensional AS amplitude of a total magnetic anomaly map, introduced by Roest et al (1992), has been a common technique for determining anomalies over their sources. Archaeological applications of three-dimensional AS have been illustrated by many researchers (Tabbagh et al, 1997;Tsokas and Hansen, 2000;Jeng et al, 2003;Buyuksarac et al, 2006;Arisoy et al, 2007). The amplitude of the three-dimensional AS is given by the square root of the squared sum of two horizontal and vertical derivatives of the magnetic field (Equation 1) (Roest et al, 1992) Aðx; yÞ j j¼ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi @T @x…”
Section: The Methods and Data Processing
mentioning
confidence: 99%