2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing and characterization of CoO and Sm2O3 codoped ceria solid solution electrolyte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…128 Yao et al investigated the codoping of Co and Sm in CeO 2 and observed no secondary CoO or Co 3 O 4 phases. 77 Combined with the observed Vegard law behavior for Co doping, they concluded that the Co ions are incorporated into the ceria lattice forming a solid solution. This seems to indicate that the codoping with Sm in this case stabilizes the Co dopants somewhat, which is not unreasonable based on the Sm defect formation energy given in Table 3.…”
Section: Defect Formation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…128 Yao et al investigated the codoping of Co and Sm in CeO 2 and observed no secondary CoO or Co 3 O 4 phases. 77 Combined with the observed Vegard law behavior for Co doping, they concluded that the Co ions are incorporated into the ceria lattice forming a solid solution. This seems to indicate that the codoping with Sm in this case stabilizes the Co dopants somewhat, which is not unreasonable based on the Sm defect formation energy given in Table 3.…”
Section: Defect Formation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…54 The 77 The smaller experimental lattice contraction is mainly due to the presence of oxygen vacancies. As will be shown in Sec.…”
Section: Aliovalent Dopants Without Compensating Oxygen Vacanciesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tolerance factor was also used to estimate the symmetry of the perovskite structure as shown in Equation 27 The crystallite sizes for the composites with y = 0.03 were calculated to be 21.80 nm, 20.41 nm and 18.45 nm for the samples calcined at 1000°C, 900°C and 800°C, respectively. The composites with the y = 0.04 composition had crystallite sizes of 22.32 nm, 21.09 nm, and 14.92 nm for the samples calcined at 1000°C, 900°C and 800°C.…”
Section: Powder X-ray Diffraction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%