2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing anaphoric constructions: Insights from electrophysiological studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…gender and number) and resolution in which contextual information and real-world knowledge are integrated to help identify the referent (Callanhan 2008). The absence of the mismatch effect in the current study may be interpreted as a failure to check the agreement of the gender feature at the first stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…gender and number) and resolution in which contextual information and real-world knowledge are integrated to help identify the referent (Callanhan 2008). The absence of the mismatch effect in the current study may be interpreted as a failure to check the agreement of the gender feature at the first stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…According to a psycholinguistic model of anaphora resolution, pronoun resolution can be differentiated into a bonding stage and a resolution stage (Garrod & Sanford, ; Garrod & Terras, ), and these two processing steps can be linked to specific language‐related ERP components (Callahan, ). The bonding stage is related to several negative manifestations such as LAN (left anterior negativity), Nref (sustained anterior negativity), or N400 (Qiu, Swaab, Chen, & Wang, ; X. D. Xu, Jiang, & Zhou, ), reflecting the difficulty of retrieving an anaphor with the antecedent entities.…”
Section: A Neurocognitive Model Of Anaphora Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the psycholinguistic model of anaphora resolution, different stages of pronoun resolution are associated with different ERP effects (Callahan, ; Silva‐Pereyra et al, ). Given that the resolution stage is consistently manifested by a late positivity effect (P600 effect) and that a similar positivity effect has also been repeatedly observed in sentences with topic shift (Hirotani & Schumacher, ; Hung & Schumacher, ; X. Yang et al, ), we predicted such an effect for topic‐shift sentences (T+C−, 8b) compared with the topic‐continued sentences (T+C+, 8a) or the subject‐shift sentences (T−C−, 9b) during pronoun resolution.…”
Section: A Neurocognitive Model Of Anaphora Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the features (e.g., case, gender, number) of the pronoun are incompatible with the only possible antecedent, a P600 is elicited. This is a broadly distributed positivity between 400 and 1,000 ms, with a central parietal or parietal maximum at approximately 500-800 ms after stimulus onset (Hammer et al, 2005;Harris, Wexler, & Holcomb, 2000;Lamers, Jansma, Hammer, & Münte, 2006, 2008Nieuwland & van Berkum, 2006;Osterhout, Bersick, & McLaughlin, 1997;Osterhout & Mobley, 1995;Schmitt et al, 2002). The P600 is elicited by a wide variety of linguistic contexts including, but not necessarily limited to, those involving syntactic violations or increased syntactic complexity (see Osterhout, Kim, & Kuperberg, 2007, for review).…”
Section: Event-related Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%