This paper deals with the long-term operation of a full-scale municipal membrane bioreactor, focusing mainly
on the membrane section. The ultrafiltration chamber, equipped with 12 130 m2 of submerged hollow-fiber
membranes, was installed after an existing alternating oxic/anoxic bioreactor. Attention is paid to a number
of practical details, from the effectiveness of different sieves to the impact of the operating parameters on the
membrane performances; finally, data of the energy consumptions and items of the operating costs are presented.
Starting from the pretreatments, while the wedge wire sieve (openings = 1 mm) involved the visible
accumulation of fibers and trash in the filtration chamber, the punched holes (holes diameter = 1.5 mm)
involved less than 100 milligrams of dry trash per liter of mixed liquor, demonstrating that they suited the
following membrane system. Moving on to the off-line equalization basin, a volume of one-fifth of the
bioreactor was sufficient to cope with the normal fluctuations of the municipal inloadings. As for the membrane
section, a net flux of 26 LMH and chemical maintenance cleaning in place once a week with only hypochlorite
(around 300 mgCl L-1) was a sustainable practice to keep the long-term permeability (adjusted at 20 °C)
stable in the range 220−240 LMH bar-1. Under this operating protocol, increases of specific aeration for
membrane scouring from 0.12 to 0.19 Nm3 m-2 h-1 did not lead to permeability gains that might justify the
increased power requirements. This evidence allows us to conclude that 0.12 Nm3 m-2 h-1 was sustainable
for the normal operation of the hollow-fiber membranes. Irreversible membrane fouling (permeability decrease
up to 150−160 LMH bar-1) was observed because of irregular discharges of municipal landfill leachate,
which, from one side, caused a drastic deflocculation of the activated sludge (sludge volume index (SVI)
increased from 110 up to 250 mL gMLSS) and, from the other side, involved a probable incoming of recalcitrant
compounds that might have acted as foulants. The power requirements of the whole treatment facility were
always lower than 0.6 kWh m-3 thanks to the general good utilization of the air supplied. The specific operating
costs related to the energy consumptions and chemicals purchase were in the range 0.06−0.08 euro m-3.