2011 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/isam.2011.5942296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process planning based on feature recognition method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…until it is compatible with the new product requirements (Järvenpää, 2012). The product requirements can be extracted from a 3D product model with a feature recognition and pre-process planning software, as has been presented in (Garcia et al 2011), or they can be formulated manually and then saved to the Knowledge Base as will be exemplified in this paper. The pre-process plan is an ordered graph of generic activities referring to specific levels on the capability taxonomy (Garcia et al, 2011).…”
Section: Capability-based Matching Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…until it is compatible with the new product requirements (Järvenpää, 2012). The product requirements can be extracted from a 3D product model with a feature recognition and pre-process planning software, as has been presented in (Garcia et al 2011), or they can be formulated manually and then saved to the Knowledge Base as will be exemplified in this paper. The pre-process plan is an ordered graph of generic activities referring to specific levels on the capability taxonomy (Garcia et al, 2011).…”
Section: Capability-based Matching Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aspects of feature-based methods, Garcia introduced a method which utilized feature-based modeling for defining a pre-process plan. The feature reorganization of this method offered both geometric and non-geometric information [3]. Deja and Siemiatkowski [4] proposed a conceptual framework for the generation of process alternatives in the form of a network that can be used to deal with uncertainty factors caused by dynamic operation conditions of manufacturing facilities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features can be geometrical or non-geometrical by nature. These processes are executed by devices and combination of devices possessing adequate functional capabilities, Garcia et al (2011).…”
Section: Fig 3 Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tool supports the viewing of the simulation as its minor function. The main function of the DeMO tool is to verify the connection to the factory floor and forward the orders to the holonic UI, Garcia et al (2011).…”
Section: Orderingmentioning
confidence: 99%