2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03516-6_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process-Based Governance in Public Administrations Using Activity-Based Costing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated by Briner and Noble (2003), by linking costs of activities to the activities themselves and expressing it on a per-unit basis, the ABC results a much more meaningful analysis of costs than traditional cost accounting (TCA), which is based on predetermined overhead rates allocating total indirect costs to the final products (Sharma & Ratnatunga, 1997). Becker et al (2009), as well as by Buttross and Schmelzle (2003), suggest using ABC in public entities due to the specific characteristics of public service provision. More recently, Oseifuah (2014) reinforced that, despite the high cost of implementation, the resistance to change, and the problems in defining cost drivers or activities, in the long-term, the benefits of ABC far outweigh the costs.…”
Section: Bibliographic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated by Briner and Noble (2003), by linking costs of activities to the activities themselves and expressing it on a per-unit basis, the ABC results a much more meaningful analysis of costs than traditional cost accounting (TCA), which is based on predetermined overhead rates allocating total indirect costs to the final products (Sharma & Ratnatunga, 1997). Becker et al (2009), as well as by Buttross and Schmelzle (2003), suggest using ABC in public entities due to the specific characteristics of public service provision. More recently, Oseifuah (2014) reinforced that, despite the high cost of implementation, the resistance to change, and the problems in defining cost drivers or activities, in the long-term, the benefits of ABC far outweigh the costs.…”
Section: Bibliographic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ABC usage in the public sector context can contribute to improving cost awareness in public sector organizations (Brown et al 1999), which also enhances public accountability, particularly in the management of resources (Miller 2009;Mohd Amir et al 2012). Becker et al (2009) in their study of application of ABC in public administration in Germany note that ABC can become an efficient tool for process governance in public sector organizations, and it also helps to assess and evaluate performance for public sector organizations.…”
Section: The Usefulness Of Abc In the Public Sector Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of NPM reform has taken hold in many government sectors across the globe, and the adoption of private sector management accounting styles has become a prominent aspect of the transformation of public sector organizations (Jackson & Lapsley 2003). It has been claimed that the application of the ABC system in the context of the public sector is relevant because its operational activities mainly involve the provision of services to the public (Becker, Bergener & Rackers 2009). This is related to the fact that the cost of providing services in public sector organizations contains a high proportion of overheads and, thus, the ABC technique can function as a method of allocating overheads in a more precise manner than the traditional costing method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, they manually analyze the process models with the objective of identifying potential weaknesses (Baacke et al, 2009, Becker et al, 2006Kusiak et al, 1994) or evaluating the compliance of corporate rules and processes (Namiri and Stojanovic, 2007). Furthermore, they try to identify possible risks (Herrmann and Herrmann, 2006;Jallow et al, 2006), to assess the overall performance in areas of business objects, material and organizational resources of an organization (Kueng, 2000;Becker et al, 2009a), or to reorganize processes, e.g. through implementing ICT-concepts (Arendsen et al, 2008;Becker et al, 2008).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%