2005
DOI: 10.1080/0965431042000312406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problem areas in Poland in terms of the objectives of the European Union's regional policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These regions were chosen for two reasons. First, they exhibit a dynamic economic development and a relatively good knowledge base (Gorzelak, 2003;Stryjakiewicz, 2002;Churski, 2005;Chojnicki & Czyz, 2006), i.e. have the absorptive capacity to integrate different types of new knowledge from abroad.…”
Section: The Case Of Poland: Context Hypotheses and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regions were chosen for two reasons. First, they exhibit a dynamic economic development and a relatively good knowledge base (Gorzelak, 2003;Stryjakiewicz, 2002;Churski, 2005;Chojnicki & Czyz, 2006), i.e. have the absorptive capacity to integrate different types of new knowledge from abroad.…”
Section: The Case Of Poland: Context Hypotheses and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature on this model shows that empirical results are far from convincing (Boldrin, Canova 2001;PugicerverPeňalver 2007). Hence, Churski (2005), and Baláž (2007) point out a strong core-periphery pattern of regional development in CEE countries with a strengthening position of core regions. This pattern is explained by the increasing importance of agglomeration economies (Geppert, Stephan 2008), and by a spatially uneven distribution of human capital (Baláž 2007), innovations (Simmie, Carpenter 2008), and infrastructure (Baláž 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional approach to regional policy emphasizes the use of public funding to achieve balanced regional development (see, e.g., Schout and Jordan, 2007). The largest part of public funding should be, therefore, spent in lagging regions (see, e.g., Churski, 2005). Crescenzi (2009), and Crescenzi, De Filippis and Pierangeli (2015) claim, in this context, that public funding ought to be allocated in order to compensate structural disadvantages of various territories.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%