2018
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probiotic Lactobacillus sp. inhibit growth, biofilm formation and gene expression of caries‐inducing Streptococcus mutans

Abstract: Streptococcus mutans contributes significantly to dental caries, which arises from homoeostasic imbalance between host and microbiota. We hypothesized that Lactobacillus sp. inhibits growth, biofilm formation and gene expression of Streptococcus mutans. Antibacterial (agar diffusion method) and antibiofilm (crystal violet assay) characteristics of probiotic Lactobacillus sp. against Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) were evaluated. We investigated whether Lactobacillus casei (ATCC 393), Lactobacillus reuteri (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(86 reference statements)
3
95
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the SEM analysis, L. paracasei 25.4 (the strain with the greatest reduction in CFU/mL count) reduced the adhesion of S. mutans cells to the discs, and this effect probably caused the reduction in the CFU count. The images obtained in this study are in agreement with Wasfi et al [37], who investigated whether L. casei (ATCC 393), L. reuteri (ATCC 23272), L. plantarum (ATCC 14917) or L. salivarius (ATCC 11741) inhibit S. mutans biofilms. In their SEM images, the authors observed changes in the extracellular matrix, fewer bacteria and smaller microcolonies in biofilms formed during coculture of S. mutans and Lactobacillus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to the SEM analysis, L. paracasei 25.4 (the strain with the greatest reduction in CFU/mL count) reduced the adhesion of S. mutans cells to the discs, and this effect probably caused the reduction in the CFU count. The images obtained in this study are in agreement with Wasfi et al [37], who investigated whether L. casei (ATCC 393), L. reuteri (ATCC 23272), L. plantarum (ATCC 14917) or L. salivarius (ATCC 11741) inhibit S. mutans biofilms. In their SEM images, the authors observed changes in the extracellular matrix, fewer bacteria and smaller microcolonies in biofilms formed during coculture of S. mutans and Lactobacillus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It was observed that the neutralized CFS BioMed Research International (CFN) caused a lower reduction in microbial growth than CFS, but CFN still showed a significant reduction in G. vaginalis growth when compared to the control. Wasfi et al found that when CFS was treated to pH = 7, the ability of all 4 Lactobacillus inhibiting the growth of Streptococcus mutans is significantly declining (P < 0:01) [40]. Our results of the four L. plantarum are consistent with the results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, by producing organic acid and peroxide, probiotics led to a decline in cell adherence and preformed biofilm. 42 Moreover, EPS produced by L. acidophilus A4 considerably could inhibit biofilm formation of E. coli O157: H7 by reducing the expression of genes related to chemotaxis (cheY) and curli formation (csgA, csgB and crl). 29 Burton et al clarified a mechanism of biofilm inhibition of C. albicans using the combination of L. plantarum SD5870, Streptococcus salivarius DSM 14685 and L. helveticus CBS N116411.…”
Section: Probiotics Influence Gene Expression Of Pathogenic Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…against the formation of biofilm and gene expression of S. mutans was studied. 42 Comelli et al selected the dairy probiotics that were capable of reducing the carcinogenicity of dental plaque. They showed that Lactococcus lactis NCC2211, as a nonpathogenic dairy probiotic, could be incorporated into a biofilm; so, imitating the dental plaque and it could be able to modify the growth of the cariogenic S. sobrinus OMZ176.…”
Section: The Activity Of Probiotics Against Different Types Of Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%