Probing the integration of land use and watershed planning in a shifting governance regime

Abstract

[1] Effective governance that contributes to the integration of water management and land use planning is essential for successful protection of drinking water sources and, ultimately, provision of safe drinking water. In many jurisdictions, land use planning and watershed management occur on separate tracks. This article examines the prospects for integration of these two critical processes. A multicase study approach is used, focusing on the specific objective of protection of drinking water sources. Experiences in three case study watershed regions in Ontario, Canada (Grand River, Upper Thames, and Lake Simcoe), were analyzed. The goal was to identify the extent to which source water protection components and indicators are expressed in land use and watershed-based planning documents. Similarities and differences among the watershed regions are distinguished through a cross-case analysis. The results suggest that a shifting governance regime for drinking water safety in Ontario is contributing to integration between land use and water management. However, proactive and ongoing efforts are required to ensure that integration occurs and that barriers to integration are addressed. Timely guidelines, incentive-based tools, up-to-date and accurate information, and adequate financial resources are essential.Citation: Plummer, R., D. de Grosbois, R. de Lo€ e, and J. Velani skis (2011), Probing the integration of land use and watershed planning in a shifting governance regime, Water Resour. Res., 47, W09502,

Microbial risk governance: challenges and opportunities in fresh water management in Canada

“…Many researchers have observed that failure to provide safe drinking water is not (solely) a result of a lack of scientific understanding, but also due to institutional and organizational failures such as inadequate financial resources, weak standards, failure to implement or enforce standards, lack of skilled staff, rivalries among agencies and insufficient political will (see e.g. de Loë and Kruetzwiser 2005;Ivey et al 2006;Plummer et al 2011). These various factors are often referred to by the general term "governance" -the laws, rules, regulations, policies, practices and institutions related to the management of water.…”

Global Water Governance and Climate Change: Identifying Innovative Arrangements for Adaptive Transformation

“…Shifting from a recent history of funding cutbacks for monitoring and evaluation of water quality, the Walkerton crisis provided the impetus for new legislation and a stronger regulatory framework to not only monitor water quality, but also for better integration between land use planning and watershed management [66,67].…”

Integrating water resource management and land-use planning at the rural–urban interface: Insights from a political economy approach

“…In real terms, this monopoly means that they have the power to define, develop and implement policies regulating land use. However, their involvement in the planning process for water resource management has fallen short of expectations, since they still give priority to their own political interests, with decisions still heavily influenced by local economic and social issues [20,21]. As a result, land-use planning based around water resource management principles may not fully achieve its potential benefits, due to incompatibility between the goals of river basin management and the political interests of the local governments.…”