2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic expression of spatially varied amino acid dimers into general form of Chou׳s pseudo amino acid composition for protein fold recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now, a number of feature extraction methods based on protein sequences have been proposed. Most of these methods are based on Chou's pseudoamino acid composition (PseAAC) [ 15 , 16 ]. PseAAC expends the simple amino acid composition (AAC) by considering and retaining the information of sequence order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, a number of feature extraction methods based on protein sequences have been proposed. Most of these methods are based on Chou's pseudoamino acid composition (PseAAC) [ 15 , 16 ]. PseAAC expends the simple amino acid composition (AAC) by considering and retaining the information of sequence order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each fold has at least 11 training examples. The accuracy of our classifiers are shown in Table 1 along with the results reported by several other published methods121516171819. Since some of the sequences in these benchmarks are similar to the templates that make up our feature space (that is, similar to the sequences of the domains from which the templates are derived), we ran our classifiers both with and without filtering of these template-similar sequences (Table 1; “filtered” versions correspond to benchmarks where sequences with >25% pairwise identity with any template were removed; see Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dehzangi et al ., Saini et al ., and Lyons et al . all used a version of EDD that had the same 27 folds, but 21 extra domains151618. This is only a small fraction of the total number of domains in this dataset, so we do not expect this to have a major impact on the results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each fold has at least 11 training examples. The accuracy of our classifiers are shown in Table 1 along with several other published methods 12,[15][16][17][18][19][20] . Our SVM classifier performed the best on all three benchmarks, with the exception of the EDD dataset, where the best performance was from the method of Zakeri et al when it was used in combination with known Interpro functional annotations.…”
Section: Fold Recognition Performancementioning
confidence: 99%