2016
DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2016.1178755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private protected areas, ecotourism development and impacts on local people's well-being: a review from case studies in Southern Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Chile has a share of 2.2% privately conserved land, in contrast to 18% of the territory that is protected in National Parks [14]. The phenomena of private conservation and effects on regional development has already been investigated in the Los Ríos region in the Parque Bíologico Huilo Huilo, Parque Oncol and the Valdivian Coastal Reserve [3,8]. In these cases, it was shown that private administrators see local people as threats to forest conservation goals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Chile has a share of 2.2% privately conserved land, in contrast to 18% of the territory that is protected in National Parks [14]. The phenomena of private conservation and effects on regional development has already been investigated in the Los Ríos region in the Parque Bíologico Huilo Huilo, Parque Oncol and the Valdivian Coastal Reserve [3,8]. In these cases, it was shown that private administrators see local people as threats to forest conservation goals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few cases have been studied. This study aims to fill the gap between existing knowledge about the case studies (Rerserva Biológica Huilo, Parque Oncol, Valdivian Coastal Reserve) in the Los Ríos Region [3,8,21].…”
Section: The Pumalín Project In Chaiténmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, native forests on private land are managed for timber and firewood, often using non‐sustainable practices under precarious land tenure arrangements or illegal operations, accounting for much of the forest loss and degradation observed in South America (Karsenty, Drigo, Piketty, & Singer, ; Keller et al, ; Llerena, Hermoza, Yalle, Flores, & Salinas, ). At the same time, individuals, conservation organizations, indigenous peoples, the forest industry, and government agencies have created public and private protected forest areas, which are dedicated to various ecosystem services including water provision and regulation (Serenari, Peterson, Wallace, & Stowhas, ). Differences in land ownership and management objectives create trade‐offs between wood production and water ecosystem services from forests at scales ranging from small (<1 km 2 ) to mid‐size (100 km 2 ) to large (>10,000 km 2 ) watersheds and to whole regions.…”
Section: Forest Land Ownership and Trade‐offs Between Water And Wood mentioning
confidence: 99%