2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2008
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privacy preserving crowd monitoring: Counting people without people models or tracking

Abstract: We present a privacy-preserving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
818
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,012 publications
(864 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
818
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…By performing the count on features, in the case of cells, a single cell is not identified with these kind of methods, but by looking at the higher level features like color, edges, etc., these methods give a direct estimate of the count. In the case of crowds [7], this has privacy advantages because their method does not directly recognise a single individual, which will give us privacy sensitive information. Often machine learning methods for finding or identifying a single individual object are available, but the feature level approach in this case does not use this information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By performing the count on features, in the case of cells, a single cell is not identified with these kind of methods, but by looking at the higher level features like color, edges, etc., these methods give a direct estimate of the count. In the case of crowds [7], this has privacy advantages because their method does not directly recognise a single individual, which will give us privacy sensitive information. Often machine learning methods for finding or identifying a single individual object are available, but the feature level approach in this case does not use this information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11,17], the estimation of automatic land cover categories is improved based on the confusion matrix, where these papers use a confusion matrix (decision-level) determined from groundtruth to correct the under and overestimates. In computer vision, counting cells [19] and crowds [7] is often performed using regression on the image features, which achieve very accurate counts (feature level). By performing the count on features, in the case of cells, a single cell is not identified with these kind of methods, but by looking at the higher level features like color, edges, etc., these methods give a direct estimate of the count.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent methods (e.g. Kong et al 2006;Chan et al 2008) attack this problem by reducing the objective from localization to counting, i.e. given an input image, estimate the number of present objects without explicitly telling their locations and sizes.…”
Section: Detection Of Multiple Occluded Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During learning, an observed set of feature descriptors, such as edges and texture, is correlated with the number of people present. During operation, the feature descriptors are classified and the estimated number of people in the scene is obtained as a result, preserving privacy to some extent [1,12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%