2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00057-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prism adaptation in normal aging: slower adaptation rate and larger aftereffect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

20
105
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
20
105
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of aftereffects (a measure of visuomotor learning), the results are also confusing. In prism adaptation tasks, Fernandez-Ruiz et al (2000) reported larger aftereffects in the older group; whereas Roller et al (2002) did not find age differences in aftereffects. Moreover, McNay and Willingham (1998) showed that aging does not affect the aftereffects during post-exposure if participants are told of the absence of the visual distortion at the start of this phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of aftereffects (a measure of visuomotor learning), the results are also confusing. In prism adaptation tasks, Fernandez-Ruiz et al (2000) reported larger aftereffects in the older group; whereas Roller et al (2002) did not find age differences in aftereffects. Moreover, McNay and Willingham (1998) showed that aging does not affect the aftereffects during post-exposure if participants are told of the absence of the visual distortion at the start of this phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It can be argued that only the first post-exposure trial is free of volitional strategic shifts (Fernandez-Ruiz et al 2000), and thus, is a truer indicator of learning than additional post-exposure trials. The reduced aftereffects in the aged group when comparing the first post-exposure trial may be indicative of reduced visuomotor learning under a gradual adaptation regime.…”
Section: Buch Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some showed comparable performance in young and old subjects (Bock and Schneider 2002;Buch et al, 2003;Etnier and Landers, 1998;Roller et al, 2002), but other showed distinct degradation in the elderly (Buch et al, 2003;Bock, 2005;Fernandez-Ruiz et al, 2000;McNay and Willingham, 1998). This discrepancy has been related to deficits of strategic control in elderly and has been interpreted as evidence that recalibration is ageresistant whereas strategic control might deteriorate in old age (Fernandez-Ruiz et al, 2000;McNay and Willingham, 1998). In another set of studies, Proteau (1996a, 1996b) suggested that older individuals appeared to process independently from each other depending on the different sources of sensory information available (vision and/or proprioception).…”
Section: Cursormentioning
confidence: 99%