2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior COVID-19 significantly reduces the risk of subsequent infection, but reinfections are seen after eight months

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
61
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13 While the investigation by Lumley et al was restricted to a specific population of predominantly healthy adult health care workers 65 years of age or younger, and was based on only two re-infections in seronegative individuals, our study extends this knowledge by data from a much larger population based survey using solely PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection cases. 13 Importantly, a recent study using SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody test data from 66,001 patients from a laboratory in south-west London documented 8 patients with evidence of re-infections, and calculated a relative risk of re-infections versus first infections of 0.0578 (95% CI: 0.0288 to 0.1160) 18 which is also compatible with our estimate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…13 While the investigation by Lumley et al was restricted to a specific population of predominantly healthy adult health care workers 65 years of age or younger, and was based on only two re-infections in seronegative individuals, our study extends this knowledge by data from a much larger population based survey using solely PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection cases. 13 Importantly, a recent study using SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody test data from 66,001 patients from a laboratory in south-west London documented 8 patients with evidence of re-infections, and calculated a relative risk of re-infections versus first infections of 0.0578 (95% CI: 0.0288 to 0.1160) 18 which is also compatible with our estimate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“… 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 According to the reports of COVID‐19 reinfection cases in studies, most of them were detected based on RT‐PCR test using nasopharyngeal swab specimens. 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 However, in other studies, in addition to the PCR test, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay for anti‐SARS‐Cov‐2 antibodies was also used. 23 , 25 The minimum and maximum time of reinfection onset from initial infection was reported from 45 to 172 days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 However, in other studies, in addition to the PCR test, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay for anti‐SARS‐Cov‐2 antibodies was also used. 23 , 25 The minimum and maximum time of reinfection onset from initial infection was reported from 45 to 172 days. 23 , 26 But in another study, the most average time of reinfection onset days from initial infection was reported as 212 days (212 ± 25 days).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the investigation by Lumley et al was restricted to a specific population of predominantly healthy adult healthcare workers 65 years of age or younger, and was based on only two re‐infections in seropositive individuals, our study extends this knowledge by data from a much larger population based survey using solely PCR‐confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection cases 13 . Importantly, a recent study using SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR and antibody test data from 66 001 patients from a laboratory in south‐west London documented 8 patients with evidence of re‐infections, and calculated a relative risk of re‐infections versus first infections of 0.0578 (95% CI: 0.0288 to 0.1160) 18 which is also compatible with our estimate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%